High CourtsSingle Bench(2010) 11 MAD CK 0078

Murugammal vs The Superintendent of Police, The Deputy Superintendent of Police and The Sub Inspector of Police

Madras High Court · Decided on 26 November 2010

HON’BLE JUDGES
G.M. Akbar Ali, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal O.P. No. 16298 of 2010

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

57 paragraphs · 1,089 words

G.M. Akbar Ali, J.—The petition is filed seeking a direction to the Respondents to re-investigate the case in Cr. No. 252/2010 on the file of

the third Respondent and investigate the case in accordance with law.

2.

A case has been registered by Krishnagiri Town Police inCr. No. 252 of 2010 for the offence punishable u/s 279 and 304A IPC. The

complainant is one Shivakumar.

3.

According to the complainant, on 7.3.2010, around 12.15 a.m, the complainant and one Selvakumar, who is the sister''s husband of the

complainant,were travelling in the motorcycle, bearing Registration No. TN23 BY 3879 from Pantharapalli at Thiruvannamalai-Krishnagiri

National Highways. It is further stated that the said Selvakumar was riding the motor cycle and the complainant was the pillion rider. According to

the complainant, at the junction of Thiruvannamalai-Krishnagiri - Chennai -Bangalore National High Ways, a lorry whose registration number is not

known, was driven in a rash and negligent manner and dashed against the motor cycle and the complainant had fallen down and fainted. He woke

up after some time, and went in search of his brother-in-law and found the body in a distant place with multiple injuries.

4.

The case was treated as ""an accident caused by an unknown lorry and the Inspector of Police conducted inquest and post mortem has also

been conducted.

5.

The Petitioner, who is the mother of the deceased, gave a complaint to the Inspector alleging that the said complainant was inimical towards her

son and suspected the death of her son and requested for re-investigation. She had alleged that her son and the sister of the complainant had an

affair and her son was forcibly married and was not allowed to visit his parents house. It is further alleged that the deceased had complained to the

Petitioner that the complainant was inimical towards the deceased.

6.

Since the Respondent has not taken any action on the complaint dated 21.4.2010, she has approached this Court by invoking the inherent

powers u/s 482 Cr.P.C for further investigation.

7.

Mr. C.S. Vijayakumar, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner would submit that a leg less body of the deceased was recovered by the police in

one place and the legs were found in another place and no such injury can be caused in a road accident. The learned Counsel also pointed out that

the alleged place of occurrence is a junction of National Highway and the body was found in a state Highway and the amputation of leg and the

injuries found on the body of the deceased would clearly show that it is a case of homicidal violence and not an accident.

8.

The learned Public Prosecutor would submit that on the complaint given by one Shivakumar, a case has been registered for the offence u/s 279

and 304 IPC. The learned Counsel submitted that on examination of the witness, both in the inquest as well as under investigation, it was found that

an unknown lorry had dashed against the motor cycle and the deceased was dragged by the lorry for some distance and in front of

Samuthuvapuram at Kuppam Road, on a speed breaker, the body was found with multiple injuries and the right leg was totally fracturered and

amputated. As per the Post Mortem Report, the death was due to multiple injuries and therefore, there is no necessity to order for re-investigation.

9.

The relevant portion in the first information is extracted as under:

VERNACULAR (TAMIL) PORTION DELETED

10.

Col.7 of the Inquest Report would read as follows:

VERNACULAR (TAMIL) PORTION DELETED

11.

col.9 reads as follows:

VERNACULAR (TAMIL) PORTION DELETED

12.

Therefore, according to investigating officer, the complainant and the deceased were travelling in a motor cycle from Thiruvannamalai

Krishnagiri Natioinal Highway towards Krishnagiri and at the junction of Madras Bangalore National Highways, the lorry hit against the motor

cycle, a hook of the lorry dragged the driver of the motor cycle for a distance and the body was dropped at Kuppam Road, where it was found.

13.

The disturbing factors are as follows:

The complainant and the deceased were travelling in the motorcycle in the National Highway and the accident had occurred at the junction of

Bangalore- Chennai and ThiruvannamalaiKrishnagiri National Highway. The complainant had not sustained any injury, but would state that he

sustained simple injuries and fainted. The damage to the motor cycle as per the inspection report ""(i)front left side bumper slightly scratched

(ii)head light shield left side slightly scratched"". After gaining consciousness, he searched for rider of the motor cycle and he was not there and

specifically states that he searched with the help of the police and found the body of the deceased at Kuppam Road, which is very far. (7 km as

per the sketch available with the case diary).

14.

The right leg below knee was amputated and separated from the body. Both found in two different places. The inquest on the body of the

deceased was not conducted where the body was found viz., on the speed breaker in front of Samuthuvapuram at Kuppam road. The inquest was

conducted at the Mortuary of the Government Hospital, Krishnagiri. There are multiple injuries. Fractures on the rib bones and the post mortem

report would reveal greasy oil stains all over the body. The observation mahazar regarding the place where the body was found did not disclose

any oil stains.

15.

A perusal of case diary would reveal that there are suspicious circumstances on the death of the deceased Selvakumar. It is unbelievable that in

a road accident, the body was hooked to the lorry and was dragged for 7 kms and was dropped in a road bumper, in an isolated place. The pillion

rider has not sustained any injuries but would state that he had fainted and that there is no damage to the motorcycle and the witnesses were

examined to the effect that they went in search of the rider of the motor cycle, they followed the blood stains on the road and according to one

witness, the body was found in one place and the amputated right leg was found in another place.

16.

Therefore, I am of the considered view it is a fit case to be re-investigated as there is serious allegation of motive and the manner of accident is

unbelievable.

17.

Therefore, the criminal original petition is allowed. The Superintndent Of Police, Krishnagiri is directed to form a special team to investigate the

Crime No. 252/2010 on the file of the third Respondent for re-investigation.