High CourtsSingle Bench(2025) 04 DEL CK 1066

Murti Devi vs State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission & Anr

Delhi High Court · Decided on 24 April 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Jain, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Miscellaneous Petition No. 735 Of 2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 332 words

Manoj Jain, J

1.

It is noticed that in the present petition, the learned State Commission has also been impleaded as respondent No.1.

2.

There is no requirement of impleading the Commission as one of the respondents herein and, therefore, the name of respondent No.1 is directed to be deleted from the array of the parties. Let amended memo of parties be filed during the course of the day.

3.

The Petitioner-Ms. Murti Devi filed a complaint way back in the year 2013 seeking compensation for suffering agony on account of unwarranted rejection of her claim.

4.

The claim was filed consequent upon the death of her husband.

5.

The complaint was, eventually, allowed in her favour in the year 2021.

6.

Such order has already attained finality.

7.

Resultantly, the petitioner filed an execution (Execution Petition No. SC/7/EA/164/2021) which is pending adjudication and the sole request in the present matter is with respect to expeditious disposal of the same.

8.

The last date before the learned State Commission was 26.03.2025 and the next date is 22.09.2025.

9.

Learned counsel for judgment-debtor company i.e. M/s Bandhan Life Insurance Limited (respondent No.2 herein) appears on advance notice.

10.

Learned  counsel  for petitioner  submits  that in  view of  the recent judgment given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Periyammal (Dead) through Lrs and Others vs. V Rajamani and Another: 2025 SCC OnLine SC 507, even otherwise, such execution needs to be fast-tracked and has to be disposed of within six months.

11.

After hearing arguments from both the sides, the present petition is disposed of with direction to petitioner to move appropriate application before the learned State Commission, seeking advancement/pre-ponement of date in the abovesaid Execution Petition with further request to expedite the disposal of the Execution Petition in terms of the abovesaid judgment.

12.

Let such application be filed within a week from today. Learned State Commission is requested to consider the same in accordance with law.

13.

Petition stands disposed of accordingly.