High CourtsDivision Bench(2026) 09 RAJ CK 6913

Murari Lal Verma vs State Of Rajasthan & Ors.

Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench · Decided on 28 September 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sameer Jain, J · Sanjay K. Agrawal, C.J
CASE NUMBER
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18459/2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

179 paragraphs · 3,905 words

Sanjay K. Agrawal, CJ:

1.

This batch of writ petitions has been filed challenging the validity of notification dated 16.03.2023, issued by the respondent-herein, whereby amendments were brought in the respective Rules mentioned in the Schedule, appended to the said notification dated 16.03.2023.

2.

The main challenge of the petitioners is against the substitution made in the existing provision under respective service rules regarding embargo on promotions of the employees for three recruitment years from the date on which, his/her promotions become due, if he/she has more than two children on or after 01.06.2002.

3.

The impugned notification dated 16.03.2023, by way of substitution, provides for consideration of all such persons for promotion upto the year 2019-20, who were previously deprived on account of the embargo, as referred to hereinabove. However, it was also clarified that persons already promoted shall not be reverted due to implementation of the substitution made vide notification dated 16.03.2023.

4.

The constitutional validity of the notification dated 16.03.2023 had been the subject matter of challenge before this Court at the Principal Seat at Jodhpur in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9429/2024-Pradeep Kumar & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., which after due consideration, came to be rejected by the Division Bench vide order dated 06.04.2026. Paragraph 1 and 15 of the said order state as under:

“1.

By way of this petition, petitioners challenge the notification dated 16.03.2023 issued by the Department of Personnel, whereby, while making several amendments in the service rules, the Rajasthan Various Service (Amendment) Rules, 2023 were notified. The impugned notification is reproduced as under:

“GOVERNMENT OF RAJASTHAN

DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL (A-Gr. II)

No.F.7(1)DOP/A-II/95/Pt. Jaipur, dated: 16.3.2023

NOTIFICATION

In exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of India, the Governor of Rajasthan hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Various Service Rules as mentioned in the Schedule appended hereto, namely:-

1.

Short title and commencement.- (1) These rules may be called the Rajasthan Various Service (Amendment) Rules, 2023.

(2)

They shall come into force from the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.

2.

Amendment.- (1) The existing provisos to sub-rule (3), (4) or (5), as the case may be, relating to Disqualification for appointment of person having more than two children of rule as mentioned in column number 3 against each of the service rules as mentioned in column number 2 of the Schedule appended hereto shall be substituted by the following, namely:-

"Provided that,-

(i)

the candidate having more than two children shall not be deemed to be disqualified for appointment so long as the number of children he/she has on 1st June, 2002, does not increase.

(ii)

where a candidate has only one child from earlier delivery but more than one child are born out of a single subsequent delivery, the children so born shall be deemed to be one entity while counting the total number of children.

(iii)

while counting the total number of children of a candidate, the child born from earlier delivery and having disability shall not be counted.

(iv)

any candidate who performed remarriage which is not against any law and before such the remarriage he is not disqualified for appointment under this sub-rule, he shall not be disqualified if any child is born out of single delivery from such remarriage.

(v)

the provisions of this sub-rule shall not be applicable to the appointment of a widow and divorcee women."

(2)

The existing provision of rule as mentioned in column number 4 against each of the service rules as mentioned in column number 2 of the Schedule appended hereto:-

"No person shall be considered for promotion for three recruitment years from the date on which his/her promotion becomes due, if he/she has more than two children on or after 1st June, 2002.”

shall be substituted by the following, namely:-

"The person who had not been considered for promotion upto the year 2019-2020 because he/she had more than two children on or after 1st June 2002 shall be considered for promotion from the date on which his/her promotion was due and on such promotion his/her pay shall be refixed at the pay which he/she would have drawn but no arrear shall be paid and if any person who has more than two children on or after 1st June,2002 and his promotion becomes due in the year 2020-2021 or thereafter shall be considered for promotion from the date on which his/her promotion becomes due and his/her pay shall be fixed for the promotional post, but he /she shall be entitled for annual increment notionally for three subsequent years and after such three years he/she shall be allowed actual benefits of such increments, however no arrears shall be paid for such notional increments. There shall be no consequential effect on subsequent promotions of the person promoted as per provisions of this sub-rule. The person already promoted shall not be reverted due to implementation of this sub-rule:"

SCHEDULE

S. No.Name of Service RulesNumber of Existing rulesNumber of existing rules
1234
1.The Rajasthan Administrative Service Rules, 195425Bsub-rule (4) of rule 28B
2.The Rajasthan Police Service Rules, 195425Csub-rule (4) of rule 28A
3.The Rajasthan Accounts Service Rules, 195425Bsub-rule (4) of rule 28A
4.The Rajasthan Inspectors of Registration and Stamps Service Rules, 195421Asub-rule (4) of rule 24A
5.The Rajasthan Service of Engineers (Electrical and Mechanical Branch) Rules, 195421Asub-rule (4) of rule 24A
6.The Rajasthan Service of Engineers and Research Officers (Irrigation Branch) Rules, 195421Asub-rule (4) of rule 24A
7.The Rajasthan Service of Engineers (B&R Branch) Rules, 195421Asub-rule (4) of rule 24A
8.The Rajasthan Cooperative Service Rules, 195421Asub-rule (4) of rule 24B
9.The Rajasthan Secretariat Service Rules, 1954-sub-rule (4) of rule 11B
10.The Rajasthan Motor Garage Service Rules, 195820Asub-rule (4) of rule 21AA
11.The Rajasthan Labour and Welfare Service Rules, 195820Asub-rule (4) of rule 23A
12.The Rajasthan Economics and Statistical Service Rules, 195815Bsub-rule (4) of rule 25A
13.The Rajasthan Service of Inspectors of Factories and Boilers and Inspector of Factories (Chemical) Rules, 195821Asub-rule (4) of rule 23A
14.The Rajasthan Jails Service Rules, 195920Asub-rule (4) of rule 23A
15.The Rajasthan State Insurance and Provident Fund Service Rules, 195921Asub-rule (4) of rule 24A
16.The Rajasthan Government Presses Service Rules, 196021Asub-rule (4) of rule 25A
17.The Rajasthan Employment Exchanges ervice Rules, 196020Asub-rule (4) of rule 24A
18.The Rajasthan Mines and Geological Service Rules, 196020sub-rule (4) of rule 23A
19.The Rajasthan Agriculture Service Rules, 196022Asub-rule (4) of rule 25A
20.The Rajasthan Industries Service Rules, 196020Asub-rule (4) of rule 23A
21.The Rajasthan Archaeology & Museums Service Rules, 196021Asub-rule (4) of rule 24A
22.The Rajasthan Horticulture Service Rules, 196220sub-rule (4) of rule 23A
(15 of 23)
23.The Rajasthan Medical Service (Collegiate Branch) Rules, 196221sub-rule (4) of rule 24A
24.The Rajasthan Forest Service Rules, 196225Asub-rule (4) of rule 31A
25.The Rajasthan Animal Husbandry Service Rules, 196321sub-rule (4) of rule 23A
26.The Rajasthan Social Welfare Service Rules, 196321sub-rule (4) of rule 24A
27.The Rajasthan Medical and Health Service Rules, 196321sub-rule (4) of rule 24A
28.The Rajasthan Public Relations Service Rules, 196621sub-rule (4) of rule 25
29.The Rajasthan Town Planning Service Rules, 196621sub-rule (4) of rule 25
30.The Rajasthan Oriental Research Institute Service Rules, 196721sub-rule (4) of rule 25
31.The Rajasthan Excise (Preventive Officers) Service Rules, 1967-sub-rule (4) of rule 17
32.The Rajasthan Service of Engineers and Allied Post (Public Health Branch) Rules, 196821sub-rule (4) of rule 25
33.The Rajasthan Ground Water Service Rules, 196921sub-rule (4) of rule 25
34.The Rajasthan Commercial Taxes Service Rules, 197115Asub-rule (4) of rule 18
35.The Rajasthan Architectural Service (P.W.D. & B & R) Rules, 197321sub-rule (4) of rule 25
36.The Rajasthan Ayurvedic, Unani, Homeopathy and Naturopathy Service Rules, 197321sub-rule (4) of rule 25
37.The Rajasthan Excise Service (General Branch) Rules, 1974-sub-rule (4) of rule 11A
38.The Rajasthan Technical Training Service Rule, 197521sub-rule (4) of rule 24A
39.The Rajasthan Archives Service Rules, 197521sub-rule (4) of rule 24A
40.The Rajasthan Engineering Service (Electrical Inspectorate Branch) Rules, 197521sub-rule (4) of rule 24A
41.The Rajasthan Food and Civil Supplies Service Rules, 197621sub-rule (4) of rule 23A
42.The Rajasthan Tourism Service Rules, 197621sub-rule (4) of rule 23A
43.The Rajasthan Home Guards and Civil Defence Service Rules, 197621sub-rule (4) of rule 23A
44.The Rajasthan Prosecution Service Rules, 1978-sub-rule (4) of rule 9
45.The Rajasthan Evaluation Service Rules, 197922sub-rule (4) of rule 24
46.The Rajasthan Forensic Science Service Rules, 197922sub-rule (4) of rule 24
47.The Rajasthan State Enterprises Service Rules, 197922sub-rule (4) of rule 24
48.The Rajasthan Transport Service Rules, 197922sub-rule (4) of rule 24
49.The Rajasthan Librarians and Physical Training Instructors Service (Collegiate Branch) Rules, 198022sub-rule (4) of rule 24
50.The Rajasthan District Gazatteers Service Rules, 198022sub-rule (4) of rule 24
51.The Rajasthan State Agricultural Marketing Service Rules, 198622sub-rule (4) of rule 24
52.The Rajasthan Educational Service (Collegiate Branch) Rules, 198621sub-rule (4) of rule 26
53.The Rajasthan State Institute of Public Administration Service Rules, 1990-sub-rule (4) of rule 9
54.The Rajasthan Rural Development State Service Rules, 200724sub-rule (4) of rule 27
55.The Rajasthan Rural Ayurvedic, Unani, Homeopathy and Naturopathy Service Rules, 200819-
56.The Rajasthan Technical Education (Engineering)26sub-rule (4) of rule 29
(16 of 23)
Service Rules, 2010
57.The Rajasthan Technical Education (Non-Engineering) Service Rules, 201025sub-rule (4) of rule 28
58.The Rajasthan Civil Aviation State Service Rules, 201326sub-rule (4) of rule 28
59.The Rajasthan Sanskrit (Collegiate Branch) Service Rules, 202227sub-rule (4) of rule 33
60.The Rajasthan Legal State and Subordinate Service Rules, 198126sub-rule (4) of rule 28
61.The Rajasthan idhi Rachna State and Subordinate Service Rules, 198126sub-rule (4) of rule 28
62.The Rajasthan Computer State and Subordinate Service Rules, 199227sub-rule (4) of rule 30
63.The Rajasthan Secretariat Librarian State and Subrodinate Service Rules, 199723sub-rule (4) of rule 26
64.The Rajasthan Rural Developmetn and Panchayati Raj State and Subordinate Service Rules, 199825sub-rule (4) of rule 28
65.The Rajasthan Integrated Child Development State and Subordinate Service Rules, 199825sub-rule (4) of rule 28
66.The Rajasthan Devasthan State and Subrodinate Service Rules, 200025sub-rule (4) of rule 28
67.The Rajasthan Tribal Area Development State and Subrodinate Service Rules, 200125sub-rule (3)(II) of rule 28
68.The Rajasthan Petroleum State and Subordinate Service Rules, 201227sub-rule (4) of rule 30
69.The Rajasthan Fisheries State and Subordinate Service Rules, 201227sub-rule (4) of rule 30
70.The Rajasthan Language and Library (State and Subordinate) Service Rules, 201327sub-rule (4) of rule 30
71.The Rajasthan Sanskrit Education State and Subordinate Service (School Branch) Rules, 201528sub-rule (4) of rule 31
72.The Rajasthan Excise Laboratory (State and Subordinate) Service Rules, 201527sub-rule (4) of rule 30
73.The Rajasthan Women Empowerment (State and Subordinate) Service Rules, 201729sub-rule (4) of rule 32
74.The Rajasthan Minority Affairs (State and Subordinate) Service Rules, 201730sub-rule (4) of rule 33
75.The Rajasthan Bio-fuel (State and Subordinate) Service Rules, 201928sub-rule (4) of rule 31
76.The Rajasthan Circuit Houses (State and Subordinate) Service Rules, 201929sub-rule (4) of rule 32
77.The Rajasthan Science and Technology (State and Subordinate) Service Rules, 202129sub-rule (4) of rule 32
78.The Rajasthan Educational (State and Subordinate) Service Rules, 202129sub-rule (4) of rule 32
79.The Rajasthan Subordinate Cooperative Service (Class-I) Rules, 195524Asub-rule (4) of rule 27A
80.The Rajasthan Subordinate Cooperative Service (Class-II) Rules, 195523A-
81.The Rajasthan Tehsildars Service Rules, 195624Dsub-rule (4) of rule 28A
82.The Rajasthan Mines and Geological Subordinate Service Rules, 196021sub-rule (4) of rule 24A
83.The Rajasthan Subordinate Accounts Service Rules, 196325sub-rule (4) of rule 28A
(17 of 23)
84.The Rajasthan Social Welfare Subordinate Service Rules, 196321sub-rule (4) of rule 24A
85.The Rajasthan Transport Subordinate Service Rules, 196321sub-rule (4) of rule 24A
86.The Rajasthan Horticulture Subordinate Service Rules, 196521sub-rule (4) of rule 24A
87.The Rajasthan Medical and Health Subordinate Service Rules, 196521sub-rule (4) of rule 24A
88.The Rajasthan Ayurvedic, Unani, Homoeopathy and Naturopathy Subordinate Service Rules, 196621sub-rule (4) of rule 25
89.The Rajasthan Industries Subordinate Service Rules, 196621sub-rule (4) of rule 25
90.The Rajasthan Engineering Subordinate Service (Public Health Branch) Rules, 196721sub-rule (4) of rule 25
91.The Rajasthan Engineering Subordinate Service (Irrigation Branch) Rules, 196721sub-rule (4) of rule 25
92.The Rajasthan Archives Subordinate Service Rules, 196821sub-rule (4) of rule 25
93.The Rajasthan Statistical Subordinate Service Rules, 197121sub-rule (4) of rule 25
94.The Rajasthan Governm,ent Presses Subordinate Service Rules, 197321sub-rule (4) of rule 24A
95.The Rajasthan Technical Education Subordinate Service Rules, 197321sub-rule (4) of rule 24A
96.The Rajasthan Subordinate Engineering (B & R Branch) Service Rules, 197321sub-rule (4) of rule 24A
97.The Rajasthan Ground Water Subordinate Service Rules, 197321sub-rule (4) of rule 24A
98.The Rajasthan Town Planning Subordinate Service Rules, 197421sub-rule (4) of rule 24A
99.The Rajasthan Food and Civil Supplies Subordinate Service Rules, 197421sub-rule (4) of rule 24A
100.The Rajasthan Excise Subordinate Service (General Branch) Rules, 197421sub-rule (4) of rule 24A
101.The Rajasthan Technical Training Subordinate Service Rules, 197521sub-rule (4) of rule 24A
102.The Rajasthan Commercial Taxes Subordinate Service (General Branch) Rules, 197521sub-rule (4) of rule 24A
103.The Rajasthan Public Relations Subordinate Service Rules, 197521sub-rule (4) of rule 24A
104.The Rajasthan Revenue Accounts Subordinate Service Rules, 197525sub-rule (4) of rule 28A
105.The Rajasthan Excise3 Subordinate Service (Preventive Branch) Rules, 197621sub-rule (4) of rule 23A
106.The Rajasthan State Enterprises Subordinate Service Rules, 197621sub-rule (4) of rule 23A
107.The Rajasthan Animal Husbandry Subordinate Service Rules, 197721sub-rule (4) of rule 23A
108.The Rajasthan Agriculture Subordinate Service Rules, 197822sub-rule (4) of rule 24
109.The Rajasthan Prosecution Subordinate Service Rules, 197817-
110.The Rajasthan Motor Garage Subordinate Service Rules, 197922sub-rule (4) of rule 24
(18 of 23)
111.The Rajasthan Education Subordinate Service (Collegiate Branch) Rules, 197922sub-rule (4) of rule 24
112.The Rajasthan Forensic Science Subordinate Service Rules, 198022sub-rule (4) of rule 24
113.The Rajasthan Police Subordinate Service Rules, 198924sub-rule (4) of rule 26
114.The Rajasthan Jails Subordinate Service Rules, 199833sub-rule (4) of rule 35
115.The Rajasthan Subordinate Service (Recruitment and other Service Conditions) Rules, 200132sub-rule (4) of rule 35
116.The Rajasthan Rural Ayurvedic, Unani, Homeopathy & Naturopathy Subordinate Serivce Rules, 200819sub-rule (4) of rule 29
117.The Rajasthan Madarsa Education Assistant Subordinate Service Rules, 201327-
118.The Rajasthan Scheduled Area Subordinate Ministerial and Class IV (Recruitment and other Service Conditions) Rules, 201426sub-rule (4) of rule 29
119.The Rajasthan Vidhyalay Sahayak Subordinate Service Rules, 201527-
120.The Rajasthan Engineering Subordinate Service (Electrical Inspectorate Branch) Rules, 202029-
121.The Rajasthan Forest Subordinate Service Rules, 201533sub-rule (4) of rule 37
122.The Rajasthan Home Guards Subordinate Service Rules, 202131sub-rule (4) of rule 33
123.The Rajasthan Secretariat Ministerial Service Rules, 197015sub-rule (4) of rule 26
124.The Rajasthan Subordinate Offices Ministerial Service Rules, 199931sub-rule (4) of rule 33
125.The Rajasthan Class IV Service (Recruitment and other service Conditions) Rules, 199919sub-rule (4) of rule 26

By order and in the name of the Governor, sd/-(Ram Niwas Mehta) Joint Secretary to the Government””

15.

In the facts of present case, private respondents were initially reverted on account of qualification arising from having more than two children as on or after the cut-off date. However, once the State, in its wisdom, has removed said disqualification and restored promotional benefits for all, the very foundation of their reversion ceases to exist and promotion originally awarded to them become legally justified.

Accordingly, the action of respondents in setting aside reversion orders and restoring promotions of private respondents is found to be legally justified. No sustainable objection can be raised against such restoration once the disqualifying condition itself has been deleted across the board.”

5.

Almost similar grounds, as were raised in the matter of Pradeep Kumar (supra), have been raised in this batch of writ petitions. The grounds of challenge in Pradeep Kumar (supra), in brief, can be summarized as under:

“i.

The retrospective amendment of the rules could not have been done as it seeks to create right for promotion from back date.

ii.

The notification should be declared ultra-virus having been introduced in excess of legal power of the State.

iii.

That the vested rights of consideration for promotion of the petitioners have been duly affected due to retrospective amendment dated 16.03.2023 as the earlier order of revision of the private respondents on account of having more than two children have been withdrawn giving effect to the notification dated 16.03.2023.

6.

As such, a Co-ordinate Division Bench of this Court, in its order dated 06.04.2026, considered all the aspects and rejected the challenge, so made to the notification dated 16.03.2023. The petitioners did not make any attempt to get these petitions listed along with the petition filed by Pradeep Kumar (supra).

7.

It is trite law that the judgment of the Co-ordinate Division Bench is binding upon the subsequent Co-ordinate Benches and even if the Co-ordinate Bench is of the view that some aspects of the matter were not considered or not raised before the Court or some additional aspects should have been gone into by the Court in deciding the matter earlier, still the subsequent Co-ordinate Bench must follow the earlier precedent.

8.

In this regard, the decision of the Supreme Court in the matter of Mahadeolal Kanodia Vs. The Administrator General of West Bengal1 may be noticed herein. It has been held in this case that if the Division Bench is disagreed with the view of previous Division Bench, question should be referred to the Larger Bench, observing in para 19 as under:

“(19)

Before we part with this appeal, however, it is our duty to refer to one incidental matter. We have noticed with some regret that when the earlier decision of two judges of the same High Court in Deorajin's Case, 58 Cal WN 64 : (AIR 1954 Cal 119), was cited before the learned judges who heard the present appeal they took on themselves to say that the previous decision was wrong, instead of following the usual procedure in case of difference of opinion with an earlier decision, of referring the question to a larger Bench. Judicial decorum no less than legal propriety forms the basis of judicial procedure. If one thing is more necessary in law than any other thing, it is the quality of certainty. That quality would totally disappear if judges of co-ordinate jurisdiction in a High Court start overruling one another's decisions. If one Division Bench of a High Court is unable to distinguish a previous decision of another Division Bench, and holding the view that the earlier decision is wrong, itself gives effect to that view the result would be utter confusion. The positions would be equally bad where a Judge sitting singly in the High Court is of opinion that the previous decision of another single Judge on a question of law is wrong and gives effect to that view instead of referring the matter to a larger Bench. In such a case lawyers would not know how to advise their clients and all courts subordinate to the High Court would find themselves in an embarrassing position of having to choose between dissentient judgments of their own High Court.”

9.

Similarly, in the matter of Jaisri Sahu Vs. Rajdewan Dubey and Others2, it has been held by their Lordships of the Supreme Court that when a Bench of the High Court gives a decision on a question of law, it should in general be followed by other Benches unless they have reasons to defer from it, in which case the proper course to adopt would be to refer the question for the decision of a Full Bench. The relevant paragraphs 9 and 10 of the aforesaid judgment read as under:

“(9)

Then there is the question of the practice to be followed when there is a conflict among decisions of Benches of the same High Court. When a Bench of the High Court gives a decision on a question of law, it should in general be followed by other Benches unless they have reasons to ditter trom it, in i which case the proper course to adopt would be to refer the question for the decision of a Full Bench……..…….

(10)………...Law will be bereft of all its utility if it should be thrown into a state of uncertainty by reason of conflicting decisions, and it is therefore desirable that in case of difference of opinion, the question should be authoritatively settled. It sometimes happens that an earlier decision given by a Bench is not brought to the notice of a Bench hearing the same question and a contrary decision is given without reference to the earlier decision…………...”

10.

Similarly, in the matter of Rajasthan Public Service Commission and Another Vs. Harish Kumar Purohit and Others3, it has been held by the Supreme Court that the earlier decision of the Division Bench is binding on a Bench of Co-ordinate strength and if Bench hearing matters subsequently entertains any doubt about correctness of the earlier decision, the only course open to it is to refer the matter to a Larger Bench.

11.

Further the Supreme Court in the matter of Official Liquidator Vs. Dayanand and Others4, considering the binding effect of ruling of the Co-ordinate Bench of the High Court, held in paragraph 90 and 91 as under:

“90.

We are distressed to note that despite several pronouncements on the subject, there is substantial increase in the number of cases involving violation of the basics of judicial discipline. The learned Single Judges and Benches of the High Courts refuse to follow and accept the verdict and law laid down by coordinate and even larger Benches by citing minor difference in the facts as the ground for doing so. Therefore, it has become necessary to reiterate that disrespect to the constitutional ethos and breach of discipline have grave impact on the credibility of judicial institution and encourages chance litigation. It must be remembered that predictability and certainty is an important hallmark on judicial jurisprudence developed in this country in the last six decades and increase in the frequency of conflicting judgments of the superior judiciary will do incalculable harm to the system inasmuch as the courts at the grass roots will not be able to decide as to which of the judgments lay down the correct law and which one should be followed.

91.

We may add that in our constitutional set-up every citizen is under a duty to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions. Those who have been entrusted with the task of administering the system and operating various constituents of the State and who take oath to act in accordance with the Constitution and uphold the same, have to set an example by exhibiting total commitment to the constitutional ideals. This principle is required to be observed with greater rigour by the members of judicial fraternity who have been bestowed with the power to adjudicate upon important constitutional and legal issues and protect and preserve rights of the individuals and society as a whole. Discipline is sine qua non for effective and efficient functioning of the judicial system. If the courts command others to act in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution and rule of law, it is not possible to countenance violation of the constitutional principle by those who are required to lay down the law.”

12.

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we are not persuaded to take the other view with regard to the notification dated 16.03.2023 as the decision rendered by this Court in Pradeep Kumar (supra), has adjudicated the issue, qua the notification dated 16.03.2023.

13.

In view of the above, this batch of writ petitions deserves to be dismissed and is, accordingly, dismissed. Pending application, if any, also dismissed.

14.

A copy of this order be placed in each connected file.

Footnotes

  1. 1.AIR 1960 SC 936
  2. 2.AIR 1962 SC 83
  3. 3.(2003) 5 SCC 480
  4. 4.(2008) 10 SCC 1