AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
Sanjay K. Agrawal, CJ:
This batch of writ petitions has been filed challenging the validity of notification dated 16.03.2023, issued by the respondent-herein, whereby amendments were brought in the respective Rules mentioned in the Schedule, appended to the said notification dated 16.03.2023.
The main challenge of the petitioners is against the substitution made in the existing provision under respective service rules regarding embargo on promotions of the employees for three recruitment years from the date on which, his/her promotions become due, if he/she has more than two children on or after 01.06.2002.
The impugned notification dated 16.03.2023, by way of substitution, provides for consideration of all such persons for promotion upto the year 2019-20, who were previously deprived on account of the embargo, as referred to hereinabove. However, it was also clarified that persons already promoted shall not be reverted due to implementation of the substitution made vide notification dated 16.03.2023.
The constitutional validity of the notification dated 16.03.2023 had been the subject matter of challenge before this Court at the Principal Seat at Jodhpur in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9429/2024-Pradeep Kumar & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., which after due consideration, came to be rejected by the Division Bench vide order dated 06.04.2026. Paragraph 1 and 15 of the said order state as under:
“1.By way of this petition, petitioners challenge the notification dated 16.03.2023 issued by the Department of Personnel, whereby, while making several amendments in the service rules, the Rajasthan Various Service (Amendment) Rules, 2023 were notified. The impugned notification is reproduced as under:
“GOVERNMENT OF RAJASTHAN
DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL (A-Gr. II)
No.F.7(1)DOP/A-II/95/Pt. Jaipur, dated: 16.3.2023
NOTIFICATION
In exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of India, the Governor of Rajasthan hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Various Service Rules as mentioned in the Schedule appended hereto, namely:-
1.Short title and commencement.- (1) These rules may be called the Rajasthan Various Service (Amendment) Rules, 2023.
(2)They shall come into force from the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.
2.Amendment.- (1) The existing provisos to sub-rule (3), (4) or (5), as the case may be, relating to Disqualification for appointment of person having more than two children of rule as mentioned in column number 3 against each of the service rules as mentioned in column number 2 of the Schedule appended hereto shall be substituted by the following, namely:-
"Provided that,-
(i)the candidate having more than two children shall not be deemed to be disqualified for appointment so long as the number of children he/she has on 1st June, 2002, does not increase.
(ii)where a candidate has only one child from earlier delivery but more than one child are born out of a single subsequent delivery, the children so born shall be deemed to be one entity while counting the total number of children.
(iii)while counting the total number of children of a candidate, the child born from earlier delivery and having disability shall not be counted.
(iv)any candidate who performed remarriage which is not against any law and before such the remarriage he is not disqualified for appointment under this sub-rule, he shall not be disqualified if any child is born out of single delivery from such remarriage.
(v)the provisions of this sub-rule shall not be applicable to the appointment of a widow and divorcee women."
(2)The existing provision of rule as mentioned in column number 4 against each of the service rules as mentioned in column number 2 of the Schedule appended hereto:-
"No person shall be considered for promotion for three recruitment years from the date on which his/her promotion becomes due, if he/she has more than two children on or after 1st June, 2002.”
shall be substituted by the following, namely:-
"The person who had not been considered for promotion upto the year 2019-2020 because he/she had more than two children on or after 1st June 2002 shall be considered for promotion from the date on which his/her promotion was due and on such promotion his/her pay shall be refixed at the pay which he/she would have drawn but no arrear shall be paid and if any person who has more than two children on or after 1st June,2002 and his promotion becomes due in the year 2020-2021 or thereafter shall be considered for promotion from the date on which his/her promotion becomes due and his/her pay shall be fixed for the promotional post, but he /she shall be entitled for annual increment notionally for three subsequent years and after such three years he/she shall be allowed actual benefits of such increments, however no arrears shall be paid for such notional increments. There shall be no consequential effect on subsequent promotions of the person promoted as per provisions of this sub-rule. The person already promoted shall not be reverted due to implementation of this sub-rule:"
SCHEDULE
S. No. Name of Service Rules Number of Existing rules Number of existing rules 1 2 3 4 1. The Rajasthan Administrative Service Rules, 1954 25B sub-rule (4) of rule 28B 2. The Rajasthan Police Service Rules, 1954 25C sub-rule (4) of rule 28A 3. The Rajasthan Accounts Service Rules, 1954 25B sub-rule (4) of rule 28A 4. The Rajasthan Inspectors of Registration and Stamps Service Rules, 1954 21A sub-rule (4) of rule 24A 5. The Rajasthan Service of Engineers (Electrical and Mechanical Branch) Rules, 1954 21A sub-rule (4) of rule 24A 6. The Rajasthan Service of Engineers and Research Officers (Irrigation Branch) Rules, 1954 21A sub-rule (4) of rule 24A 7. The Rajasthan Service of Engineers (B&R Branch) Rules, 1954 21A sub-rule (4) of rule 24A 8. The Rajasthan Cooperative Service Rules, 1954 21A sub-rule (4) of rule 24B 9. The Rajasthan Secretariat Service Rules, 1954 - sub-rule (4) of rule 11B 10. The Rajasthan Motor Garage Service Rules, 1958 20A sub-rule (4) of rule 21AA 11. The Rajasthan Labour and Welfare Service Rules, 1958 20A sub-rule (4) of rule 23A 12. The Rajasthan Economics and Statistical Service Rules, 1958 15B sub-rule (4) of rule 25A 13. The Rajasthan Service of Inspectors of Factories and Boilers and Inspector of Factories (Chemical) Rules, 1958 21A sub-rule (4) of rule 23A 14. The Rajasthan Jails Service Rules, 1959 20A sub-rule (4) of rule 23A 15. The Rajasthan State Insurance and Provident Fund Service Rules, 1959 21A sub-rule (4) of rule 24A 16. The Rajasthan Government Presses Service Rules, 1960 21A sub-rule (4) of rule 25A 17. The Rajasthan Employment Exchanges ervice Rules, 1960 20A sub-rule (4) of rule 24A 18. The Rajasthan Mines and Geological Service Rules, 1960 20 sub-rule (4) of rule 23A 19. The Rajasthan Agriculture Service Rules, 1960 22A sub-rule (4) of rule 25A 20. The Rajasthan Industries Service Rules, 1960 20A sub-rule (4) of rule 23A 21. The Rajasthan Archaeology & Museums Service Rules, 1960 21A sub-rule (4) of rule 24A 22. The Rajasthan Horticulture Service Rules, 1962 20 sub-rule (4) of rule 23A
(15 of 23) 23. The Rajasthan Medical Service (Collegiate Branch) Rules, 1962 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 24A 24. The Rajasthan Forest Service Rules, 1962 25A sub-rule (4) of rule 31A 25. The Rajasthan Animal Husbandry Service Rules, 1963 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 23A 26. The Rajasthan Social Welfare Service Rules, 1963 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 24A 27. The Rajasthan Medical and Health Service Rules, 1963 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 24A 28. The Rajasthan Public Relations Service Rules, 1966 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 25 29. The Rajasthan Town Planning Service Rules, 1966 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 25 30. The Rajasthan Oriental Research Institute Service Rules, 1967 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 25 31. The Rajasthan Excise (Preventive Officers) Service Rules, 1967 - sub-rule (4) of rule 17 32. The Rajasthan Service of Engineers and Allied Post (Public Health Branch) Rules, 1968 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 25 33. The Rajasthan Ground Water Service Rules, 1969 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 25 34. The Rajasthan Commercial Taxes Service Rules, 1971 15A sub-rule (4) of rule 18 35. The Rajasthan Architectural Service (P.W.D. & B & R) Rules, 1973 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 25 36. The Rajasthan Ayurvedic, Unani, Homeopathy and Naturopathy Service Rules, 1973 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 25 37. The Rajasthan Excise Service (General Branch) Rules, 1974 - sub-rule (4) of rule 11A 38. The Rajasthan Technical Training Service Rule, 1975 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 24A 39. The Rajasthan Archives Service Rules, 1975 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 24A 40. The Rajasthan Engineering Service (Electrical Inspectorate Branch) Rules, 1975 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 24A 41. The Rajasthan Food and Civil Supplies Service Rules, 1976 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 23A 42. The Rajasthan Tourism Service Rules, 1976 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 23A 43. The Rajasthan Home Guards and Civil Defence Service Rules, 1976 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 23A 44. The Rajasthan Prosecution Service Rules, 1978 - sub-rule (4) of rule 9 45. The Rajasthan Evaluation Service Rules, 1979 22 sub-rule (4) of rule 24 46. The Rajasthan Forensic Science Service Rules, 1979 22 sub-rule (4) of rule 24 47. The Rajasthan State Enterprises Service Rules, 1979 22 sub-rule (4) of rule 24 48. The Rajasthan Transport Service Rules, 1979 22 sub-rule (4) of rule 24 49. The Rajasthan Librarians and Physical Training Instructors Service (Collegiate Branch) Rules, 1980 22 sub-rule (4) of rule 24 50. The Rajasthan District Gazatteers Service Rules, 1980 22 sub-rule (4) of rule 24 51. The Rajasthan State Agricultural Marketing Service Rules, 1986 22 sub-rule (4) of rule 24 52. The Rajasthan Educational Service (Collegiate Branch) Rules, 1986 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 26 53. The Rajasthan State Institute of Public Administration Service Rules, 1990 - sub-rule (4) of rule 9 54. The Rajasthan Rural Development State Service Rules, 2007 24 sub-rule (4) of rule 27 55. The Rajasthan Rural Ayurvedic, Unani, Homeopathy and Naturopathy Service Rules, 2008 19 - 56. The Rajasthan Technical Education (Engineering) 26 sub-rule (4) of rule 29 (16 of 23) Service Rules, 2010 57. The Rajasthan Technical Education (Non-Engineering) Service Rules, 2010 25 sub-rule (4) of rule 28 58. The Rajasthan Civil Aviation State Service Rules, 2013 26 sub-rule (4) of rule 28 59. The Rajasthan Sanskrit (Collegiate Branch) Service Rules, 2022 27 sub-rule (4) of rule 33 60. The Rajasthan Legal State and Subordinate Service Rules, 1981 26 sub-rule (4) of rule 28 61. The Rajasthan idhi Rachna State and Subordinate Service Rules, 1981 26 sub-rule (4) of rule 28 62. The Rajasthan Computer State and Subordinate Service Rules, 1992 27 sub-rule (4) of rule 30 63. The Rajasthan Secretariat Librarian State and Subrodinate Service Rules, 1997 23 sub-rule (4) of rule 26 64. The Rajasthan Rural Developmetn and Panchayati Raj State and Subordinate Service Rules, 1998 25 sub-rule (4) of rule 28 65. The Rajasthan Integrated Child Development State and Subordinate Service Rules, 1998 25 sub-rule (4) of rule 28 66. The Rajasthan Devasthan State and Subrodinate Service Rules, 2000 25 sub-rule (4) of rule 28 67. The Rajasthan Tribal Area Development State and Subrodinate Service Rules, 2001 25 sub-rule (3)(II) of rule 28 68. The Rajasthan Petroleum State and Subordinate Service Rules, 2012 27 sub-rule (4) of rule 30 69. The Rajasthan Fisheries State and Subordinate Service Rules, 2012 27 sub-rule (4) of rule 30 70. The Rajasthan Language and Library (State and Subordinate) Service Rules, 2013 27 sub-rule (4) of rule 30 71. The Rajasthan Sanskrit Education State and Subordinate Service (School Branch) Rules, 2015 28 sub-rule (4) of rule 31 72. The Rajasthan Excise Laboratory (State and Subordinate) Service Rules, 2015 27 sub-rule (4) of rule 30 73. The Rajasthan Women Empowerment (State and Subordinate) Service Rules, 2017 29 sub-rule (4) of rule 32 74. The Rajasthan Minority Affairs (State and Subordinate) Service Rules, 2017 30 sub-rule (4) of rule 33 75. The Rajasthan Bio-fuel (State and Subordinate) Service Rules, 2019 28 sub-rule (4) of rule 31 76. The Rajasthan Circuit Houses (State and Subordinate) Service Rules, 2019 29 sub-rule (4) of rule 32 77. The Rajasthan Science and Technology (State and Subordinate) Service Rules, 2021 29 sub-rule (4) of rule 32 78. The Rajasthan Educational (State and Subordinate) Service Rules, 2021 29 sub-rule (4) of rule 32 79. The Rajasthan Subordinate Cooperative Service (Class-I) Rules, 1955 24A sub-rule (4) of rule 27A 80. The Rajasthan Subordinate Cooperative Service (Class-II) Rules, 1955 23A - 81. The Rajasthan Tehsildars Service Rules, 1956 24D sub-rule (4) of rule 28A 82. The Rajasthan Mines and Geological Subordinate Service Rules, 1960 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 24A 83. The Rajasthan Subordinate Accounts Service Rules, 1963 25 sub-rule (4) of rule 28A (17 of 23) 84. The Rajasthan Social Welfare Subordinate Service Rules, 1963 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 24A 85. The Rajasthan Transport Subordinate Service Rules, 1963 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 24A 86. The Rajasthan Horticulture Subordinate Service Rules, 1965 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 24A 87. The Rajasthan Medical and Health Subordinate Service Rules, 1965 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 24A 88. The Rajasthan Ayurvedic, Unani, Homoeopathy and Naturopathy Subordinate Service Rules, 1966 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 25 89. The Rajasthan Industries Subordinate Service Rules, 1966 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 25 90. The Rajasthan Engineering Subordinate Service (Public Health Branch) Rules, 1967 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 25 91. The Rajasthan Engineering Subordinate Service (Irrigation Branch) Rules, 1967 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 25 92. The Rajasthan Archives Subordinate Service Rules, 1968 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 25 93. The Rajasthan Statistical Subordinate Service Rules, 1971 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 25 94. The Rajasthan Governm,ent Presses Subordinate Service Rules, 1973 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 24A 95. The Rajasthan Technical Education Subordinate Service Rules, 1973 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 24A 96. The Rajasthan Subordinate Engineering (B & R Branch) Service Rules, 1973 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 24A 97. The Rajasthan Ground Water Subordinate Service Rules, 1973 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 24A 98. The Rajasthan Town Planning Subordinate Service Rules, 1974 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 24A 99. The Rajasthan Food and Civil Supplies Subordinate Service Rules, 1974 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 24A 100. The Rajasthan Excise Subordinate Service (General Branch) Rules, 1974 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 24A 101. The Rajasthan Technical Training Subordinate Service Rules, 1975 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 24A 102. The Rajasthan Commercial Taxes Subordinate Service (General Branch) Rules, 1975 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 24A 103. The Rajasthan Public Relations Subordinate Service Rules, 1975 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 24A 104. The Rajasthan Revenue Accounts Subordinate Service Rules, 1975 25 sub-rule (4) of rule 28A 105. The Rajasthan Excise3 Subordinate Service (Preventive Branch) Rules, 1976 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 23A 106. The Rajasthan State Enterprises Subordinate Service Rules, 1976 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 23A 107. The Rajasthan Animal Husbandry Subordinate Service Rules, 1977 21 sub-rule (4) of rule 23A 108. The Rajasthan Agriculture Subordinate Service Rules, 1978 22 sub-rule (4) of rule 24 109. The Rajasthan Prosecution Subordinate Service Rules, 1978 17 - 110. The Rajasthan Motor Garage Subordinate Service Rules, 1979 22 sub-rule (4) of rule 24 (18 of 23) 111. The Rajasthan Education Subordinate Service (Collegiate Branch) Rules, 1979 22 sub-rule (4) of rule 24 112. The Rajasthan Forensic Science Subordinate Service Rules, 1980 22 sub-rule (4) of rule 24 113. The Rajasthan Police Subordinate Service Rules, 1989 24 sub-rule (4) of rule 26 114. The Rajasthan Jails Subordinate Service Rules, 1998 33 sub-rule (4) of rule 35 115. The Rajasthan Subordinate Service (Recruitment and other Service Conditions) Rules, 2001 32 sub-rule (4) of rule 35 116. The Rajasthan Rural Ayurvedic, Unani, Homeopathy & Naturopathy Subordinate Serivce Rules, 2008 19 sub-rule (4) of rule 29 117. The Rajasthan Madarsa Education Assistant Subordinate Service Rules, 2013 27 - 118. The Rajasthan Scheduled Area Subordinate Ministerial and Class IV (Recruitment and other Service Conditions) Rules, 2014 26 sub-rule (4) of rule 29 119. The Rajasthan Vidhyalay Sahayak Subordinate Service Rules, 2015 27 - 120. The Rajasthan Engineering Subordinate Service (Electrical Inspectorate Branch) Rules, 2020 29 - 121. The Rajasthan Forest Subordinate Service Rules, 2015 33 sub-rule (4) of rule 37 122. The Rajasthan Home Guards Subordinate Service Rules, 2021 31 sub-rule (4) of rule 33 123. The Rajasthan Secretariat Ministerial Service Rules, 1970 15 sub-rule (4) of rule 26 124. The Rajasthan Subordinate Offices Ministerial Service Rules, 1999 31 sub-rule (4) of rule 33 125. The Rajasthan Class IV Service (Recruitment and other service Conditions) Rules, 1999 19 sub-rule (4) of rule 26 By order and in the name of the Governor, sd/-(Ram Niwas Mehta) Joint Secretary to the Government””
15.In the facts of present case, private respondents were initially reverted on account of qualification arising from having more than two children as on or after the cut-off date. However, once the State, in its wisdom, has removed said disqualification and restored promotional benefits for all, the very foundation of their reversion ceases to exist and promotion originally awarded to them become legally justified.
Accordingly, the action of respondents in setting aside reversion orders and restoring promotions of private respondents is found to be legally justified. No sustainable objection can be raised against such restoration once the disqualifying condition itself has been deleted across the board.”
Almost similar grounds, as were raised in the matter of Pradeep Kumar (supra), have been raised in this batch of writ petitions. The grounds of challenge in Pradeep Kumar (supra), in brief, can be summarized as under:
“i.The retrospective amendment of the rules could not have been done as it seeks to create right for promotion from back date.
ii.The notification should be declared ultra-virus having been introduced in excess of legal power of the State.
iii.That the vested rights of consideration for promotion of the petitioners have been duly affected due to retrospective amendment dated 16.03.2023 as the earlier order of revision of the private respondents on account of having more than two children have been withdrawn giving effect to the notification dated 16.03.2023.
As such, a Co-ordinate Division Bench of this Court, in its order dated 06.04.2026, considered all the aspects and rejected the challenge, so made to the notification dated 16.03.2023. The petitioners did not make any attempt to get these petitions listed along with the petition filed by Pradeep Kumar (supra).
It is trite law that the judgment of the Co-ordinate Division Bench is binding upon the subsequent Co-ordinate Benches and even if the Co-ordinate Bench is of the view that some aspects of the matter were not considered or not raised before the Court or some additional aspects should have been gone into by the Court in deciding the matter earlier, still the subsequent Co-ordinate Bench must follow the earlier precedent.
In this regard, the decision of the Supreme Court in the matter of Mahadeolal Kanodia Vs. The Administrator General of West Bengal1 may be noticed herein. It has been held in this case that if the Division Bench is disagreed with the view of previous Division Bench, question should be referred to the Larger Bench, observing in para 19 as under:
“(19)Before we part with this appeal, however, it is our duty to refer to one incidental matter. We have noticed with some regret that when the earlier decision of two judges of the same High Court in Deorajin's Case, 58 Cal WN 64 : (AIR 1954 Cal 119), was cited before the learned judges who heard the present appeal they took on themselves to say that the previous decision was wrong, instead of following the usual procedure in case of difference of opinion with an earlier decision, of referring the question to a larger Bench. Judicial decorum no less than legal propriety forms the basis of judicial procedure. If one thing is more necessary in law than any other thing, it is the quality of certainty. That quality would totally disappear if judges of co-ordinate jurisdiction in a High Court start overruling one another's decisions. If one Division Bench of a High Court is unable to distinguish a previous decision of another Division Bench, and holding the view that the earlier decision is wrong, itself gives effect to that view the result would be utter confusion. The positions would be equally bad where a Judge sitting singly in the High Court is of opinion that the previous decision of another single Judge on a question of law is wrong and gives effect to that view instead of referring the matter to a larger Bench. In such a case lawyers would not know how to advise their clients and all courts subordinate to the High Court would find themselves in an embarrassing position of having to choose between dissentient judgments of their own High Court.”
Similarly, in the matter of Jaisri Sahu Vs. Rajdewan Dubey and Others2, it has been held by their Lordships of the Supreme Court that when a Bench of the High Court gives a decision on a question of law, it should in general be followed by other Benches unless they have reasons to defer from it, in which case the proper course to adopt would be to refer the question for the decision of a Full Bench. The relevant paragraphs 9 and 10 of the aforesaid judgment read as under:
“(9)Then there is the question of the practice to be followed when there is a conflict among decisions of Benches of the same High Court. When a Bench of the High Court gives a decision on a question of law, it should in general be followed by other Benches unless they have reasons to ditter trom it, in i which case the proper course to adopt would be to refer the question for the decision of a Full Bench……..…….
(10)………...Law will be bereft of all its utility if it should be thrown into a state of uncertainty by reason of conflicting decisions, and it is therefore desirable that in case of difference of opinion, the question should be authoritatively settled. It sometimes happens that an earlier decision given by a Bench is not brought to the notice of a Bench hearing the same question and a contrary decision is given without reference to the earlier decision…………...”
Similarly, in the matter of Rajasthan Public Service Commission and Another Vs. Harish Kumar Purohit and Others3, it has been held by the Supreme Court that the earlier decision of the Division Bench is binding on a Bench of Co-ordinate strength and if Bench hearing matters subsequently entertains any doubt about correctness of the earlier decision, the only course open to it is to refer the matter to a Larger Bench.
Further the Supreme Court in the matter of Official Liquidator Vs. Dayanand and Others4, considering the binding effect of ruling of the Co-ordinate Bench of the High Court, held in paragraph 90 and 91 as under:
“90.We are distressed to note that despite several pronouncements on the subject, there is substantial increase in the number of cases involving violation of the basics of judicial discipline. The learned Single Judges and Benches of the High Courts refuse to follow and accept the verdict and law laid down by coordinate and even larger Benches by citing minor difference in the facts as the ground for doing so. Therefore, it has become necessary to reiterate that disrespect to the constitutional ethos and breach of discipline have grave impact on the credibility of judicial institution and encourages chance litigation. It must be remembered that predictability and certainty is an important hallmark on judicial jurisprudence developed in this country in the last six decades and increase in the frequency of conflicting judgments of the superior judiciary will do incalculable harm to the system inasmuch as the courts at the grass roots will not be able to decide as to which of the judgments lay down the correct law and which one should be followed.
91.We may add that in our constitutional set-up every citizen is under a duty to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions. Those who have been entrusted with the task of administering the system and operating various constituents of the State and who take oath to act in accordance with the Constitution and uphold the same, have to set an example by exhibiting total commitment to the constitutional ideals. This principle is required to be observed with greater rigour by the members of judicial fraternity who have been bestowed with the power to adjudicate upon important constitutional and legal issues and protect and preserve rights of the individuals and society as a whole. Discipline is sine qua non for effective and efficient functioning of the judicial system. If the courts command others to act in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution and rule of law, it is not possible to countenance violation of the constitutional principle by those who are required to lay down the law.”
After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we are not persuaded to take the other view with regard to the notification dated 16.03.2023 as the decision rendered by this Court in Pradeep Kumar (supra), has adjudicated the issue, qua the notification dated 16.03.2023.
In view of the above, this batch of writ petitions deserves to be dismissed and is, accordingly, dismissed. Pending application, if any, also dismissed.
A copy of this order be placed in each connected file.
