High CourtsSingle Bench(2025) 04 DEL CK 1751

Munni Devi vs Tele Wood

Delhi High Court · Decided on 8 April 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Jain, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
CM(M) 543/2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 373 words
1.

Plaintiff (respondent herein) had moved an application before the learned Trial Court seeking to lead evidence in rebuttal by moving an application under Order XVIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC. Such application was allowed by the learned Trial Court vide order dated 02.08.2022.

2.

Defendant, feeling aggrieved, has challenged the abovesaid order.

3.

During pendency of the present petition, this Court had permitted the learned Trial Court to record evidence of the proposed witness i.e. one official from Revenue Department (Patwari) but with direction that the matter would be kept in abeyance till further orders are passed by this Court. It is apprised that such witness has already been examined.

4.

The present application has now been moved by respondent/plaintiff wherein it has been contended that in order to avoid any further delay in the matter, the plaintiff would have no objection if the learned Trial Court is directed to proceed further with the matter, while ignoring the abovesaid rebuttal evidence which was recorded/sought to be recorded by virtue of impugned order dated 02.08.2022.

5.

All in all, learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that she would have no objection if the present petition is allowed. She, however, supplements that a request be made to learned Trial Court to adjudicate the suit which would now be at the stage of final arguments.

6.

The next date before the learned Trial Court is stated to be 09.05.2025.

7.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has assured that he would render due assistance and cooperation to the learned Trial Court and prays that in view of the fact that the prayer has been conceded to, the present petition may be disposed of accordingly.

8.

Keeping in mind the overall facts and circumstances of the case, and the fact that the petitioner is no longer interested in relying on the rebuttal evidence, the present petition is disposed of with direction that the learned Trial Court shall ignore such evidence led in rebuttal and since the case is at the stage of final arguments, the suit be disposed of as expeditiously as possible.

9.

The present petition, along with pending applications, is disposed of in aforesaid terms.

10.

The next date of 14.08.2025 is cancelled.