High CourtsDivision Bench(1920) 07 AHC CK 0013

Munna Lal and Others vs Sadanun Lal and Others

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 29 July 1920 · Citation: AIR 1920 All 359 : 76 Ind. Cas. 624

HON’BLE JUDGES
Walsh, J · Gokul Prasad, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 94 words
1.

We think that the finding of fact by the learned Judge that the practice was to render accounts and make payments at Shahjahanpur is fatal to this application. As has often been said, evidence may be looked into in an application in revision to see whether the jurisdiction of the Court has been properly exercised, but if there is a conflict of evidence and an issue of fact has been found in one way, the Re-visional Court does not revise the finding of fact. Under these circumstances, the application is rejected with costs.