High CourtsSingle Bench(1910) 03 MAD CK 0003

Munisami and Others vs Emperor

Madras High Court · Decided on 24 March 1910 · Citation: 7 Ind. Cas. 416

HON’BLE JUDGES
Miller, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 116 words

Miller, J.—The finding, that the accused, other than the second, ""surrounded the constable in a threatening attitude"", is not to my mind a

sufficient finding that an assault was committed by them within the meaning of Section 351 of the Indian Penal Code. It is not suggested that the

assault committed by the 2nd accused was constructively the offence of all.

2.

As to the 2nd accused, I think on the facts found the conviction is right. The constable was in the execution of his duty at the time the blow was

given. I set aside the conviction and sentence passed on the 1st, 3rd and 4th accused and confirm those passed on the 2nd accused.