High CourtsDivision Bench(1926) 10 MAD CK 0005

Mulukutla Annapurnamma vs Mulukutla Atchutarammayya Garu

Madras High Court · Decided on 21 October 1926 · Citation: 100 Ind. Cas. 111

HON’BLE JUDGES
Wallace, J · Madhavan Nair, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 134 words
1.

The learned District Judge has overlooked that Kashinath Parashram v. Gourabai 28 Ind. Cas. 473 has been overruled by Keshavlal Punjalal v.

Collector of Ahmeddbad 77 Ind. Cas. 749: AIR 1924 Bom. 228. We think we must follow the principle laid down in In re Dasu Manavala Ghetty

4 Ind. Cas. 1064 and hold that petitioner is only bound to pay stamp duty for Probate on the amount of the right, title and interest of the testator in

the property bequeathed and so far as ancestral property is concerned that would be 1/4th of the ancestral estate. If, of course, there is other

separate non-ancestral property, separate fee will have to be paid on that. There will be no order as to costs. The papers are returned to the lower

Court for disposal.