High CourtsFull Bench(1930) 06 BOM CK 0018

Mukhal Singh vs Kishuni Singh

Bombay High Court · Decided on 24 June 1930 · Citation: (1930) 32 BOMLR 1576

HON’BLE JUDGES
Viscount Dunedin, J · Lancelot Sanderson, J · John Wallis, J · George Lowndes, J · Binod Mitter, J
RESULT
Dismissed

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 122 words

Viscount Dunedin, J.—In this case the question has been raised as to whether the appeal is competent. Special leave to appeal was granted on an ex parts application ; but it has been settled in a judgment of this Board that that does not preclude the Board, when the true facts are brought before it, from going into the question of whether the appeal is competent or not: (1930) L.R. 57 I.A. 186 (Privy Council) . Upon that question the present case seems to be entirely covered by another decision of the Board in (1929) L.R. 57 I.A. 56 (Privy Council) Under these circumstances their Lordships will humbly advice His Majesty that the appeal is incompetent and should be dismissed with costs.