High CourtsSingle Bench(2022) 10 GUJ CK 0092

Mukeshkumar S/O Gasiramji Gangadharji Sharma vs State Of Gujarat

Gujarat High Court · Decided on 14 October 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Gita Gopi, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
R/Criminal Misc.Application No. 11228 Of 2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 779 words

Gita Gopi, J

1.

This application has been filed under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for regular bail in connection with the FIR No. 11216005220075 of 2022 registered with Dahegam Police Station, Gandhinagar for offences punishable under sections 302, 323 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code and section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act.

2.

Learned advocate Mr. Jagat Patel for the applicant submits that the cause of death is intracranial hemorrhage due to head injury and the eye-witness who was injured namely Mr. Sonu Suresh Rathod has attributed the applicant armed with Iron Angle Pipe and the allegation is that he had given blows on the back of the deceased with the Iron Angle Pipe. Referring to the post-morterm note, Mr. Patel learned advocate submits that none of the injury is shown on the back of the deceased while the injury is some swelling and abrasion on the eyes and frontal area and further all the description of the injuries are at Column 19 under the column of head. Mr. Patel learned advocate for the applicant further submits that it is some verbal altercation between the accused and the deceased along with the eye-witnesses where the present applicant is the manager of the factory and he had asked all the laborers as the manager not to talk in a loud voice and at that time it is alleged that the applicant had held Sonu Rathod with his hair and had slapped him thrice and during that time Subhash and Rajkumar intervened to release them and Mr. Patel submits that because of the said quarrel the accused is alleged to have done him to death while the post-morterm note does not suggest any injury given by the Iron Angle Pipe which was held by the applicant . It was, therefore, prayed that the present application may be allowed and the applicant herein may also be released on regular bail.

3.

Mr. Pranav Trivedi, learned APP submits that both the accused were present at the scene of offence and there are eye-witnesses including Sonu Rathod who had suggested about the injuries inflicted by the applicant with the Iron Angle Pipe and thus further submits that the post-morterm note cannot be a conclusive evidence to suggest that no injury was caused by the applicant . It was, therefore, prayed that no discretion may be exercised in favour of the applicant.

4.

The applicant is a factory manager and initially as per the statement of Sonu Rathod, the applicant quarreled with him and the applicant is alleged to have given him slaps on the face and the said quarrel has been alleged to be cause of attack attributed during the night time at about 10.00 PM but the post-morterm note does not find any injury on the back as alleged by the eye-witness. The panchnama does not disclose any blood stains on the Iron Angle Pipe. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, discretion is exercised in favour of the applicant.

5.

Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail in connection with FIR No. 11216005220075 of 2022 registered with Dahegam Police Station, Gandhinagar for offences punishable under sections 302, 323 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code and section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act on executing a personal bond of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that the applicant shall:

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;

[c] surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a week;

[d] not leave India without prior permission of the concerned trial court;

[e] furnish the present address of residence to the Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of the concerned trial court;

6.

The authorities shall adhere to its own Circular relating to COVID-19 and, thereafter, will release the applicant only if the applicant is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter. Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case.

7.

Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Court/authority by Fax or Email forthwith.