High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 03 CHH CK 0285

MUKESH KUMAR SIDAR AND ANR. vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 26 March 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
P. SAM KOSHY
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
MISC. CRIMINAL CASE NO.734 OF 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

16 paragraphs · 334 words
1.

This is the first bail application seeking for grant of bail to the Applicants who are in jail since 03.11.2017 in connection with Crime No. 171 of 2017

registered at Police Station Pussour, District Raigarh, for the offence punishable under Section 394/34 IPC.

2.

The allegation as per prosecution is that, the present applicants is said to have on the date of incident i.e. 26.09.2017 abruptly stopped the

complainant who was going on a four wheeler and is said to have demanded money from them and out of fear the complainant is said to have paid an

amount of Rs.1030/-. In addition, another Rs.200/-was also borrowed from the nearby Gupta Restaurant and paid to the present applicants.

3.

Learned Counsel for the applicants submits that the very fact that after borrowing an amount of Rs.200/-from Gupta Restaurant the complainant

has paid the said amount to the applicants by itself shows that the nature of allegation would not fit in the definition of robbery as is defined under

Section 394 IPC. Thus, prayed for applicants to be released on bail.

4.

The State counsel opposing the application submits that the present applicants is said to have put the complainant under severe threat and out of

fear the complainant has paid money to the applicants, and as such they do not deserve for bail.

5.

Without commenting on merits, considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case particularly taking into consideration the nature of

allegations and also considering the period of custody undergone by the applicants, this Court is of the opinion that the present is a fit case where the

Applicants can be enlarged on bail.

6.

Accordingly, the application for grant of bail is allowed. It is directed that the Applicants shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond

for a sum of Rs.20,000/- each with one surety of the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court for their appearance as and when

directed.