High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 11 GUJ CK 0009

Mukesh Dilip Mali vs State Of Gujarat

Gujarat High Court · Decided on 9 November 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Hemant M. Prachchhak, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
R/Criminal Misc.Application No. 16912 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 505 words

Hemant M. Prachchhak, J

1.

This bail application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for regular bail in connection with an offence being Prohi. C.R.No.11210015210215 of 2021 registered with D. C. B. Police Station, Surat for the offence punishable under Sections 65(a), 65(e), 81, 98(2) and 99 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act.

2.

Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that considering the nature of offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

3.

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed grant of regular bail looking to the nature and gravity of the offence.

4.

Learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties do not press for reasoned order.

5.

I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and considered the allegations levelled against the applicant.

6.

In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of allegations made against the applicant in the FIR, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail. Hence, the present application is allowed and the applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail in connection with an offence being Prohi. C.R.No.11210015210215 of 2021 registered with D. C. B. Police Station, Surat, on executing a personal bond of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand Only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injuries to the interest of the prosecution;

[c] surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a week;

[d] not leave the India without prior permission of the Sessions Judge concerned;

[e] mark presence before the concerned Police Station on alternate Monday for a period of three months only, between 10:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m.;

[f] furnish latest address of residence to the Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of this Court;

7.

The Authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter. Bail bond to be executed before the learned Lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law. At the trial, learned Trial Court shall not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature, qua the evidence at this stage, made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent.