Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2022) 08 ITAT CK 0009

Mukesh vs ITO

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 4 August 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
N. K. Billaiya, (AM) · Yogesh Kumar US, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Income Tax Appeal No. 1743, 1744, 1745/DEL/2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 273 words
1.

ITA No.1743/Del/2020 is the appeal by the assessee is preferred against the order of the CIT(A)-2, Gurgaon dated 31.01.2020 pertai ning to A.Y.2011-12 wherein the CIT(A) has confirmed the levy of penalty u/s. 271F of the Act amounting to Rs.5000/- by an exparte order.

2.

ITA No.1744/Del/2020 is the appeal by the assessee preferred against the order of the CIT(A)-2, Gurgaon dated 06.03.2020 pertaining to A.Y. 2011-12 wherein the CIT(A) confirmed the levy of penalty u/s. 271 (1) (c) of the Act amounting to Rs.812547/-.

3.

ITA No.1745/Del/2020 is the appeal by the assessee preferred against the order of the CIT(A)-2, Gurgaon dated 31.01.2020 pertaining to A.Y.2011-12 wherein the CIT(A) confirmed the levy of penalty u/s. 271 (1) (b) of the Act amounting to Rs.10,000/- by an exparte order.

4.

None appeared on behalf of the assessee inspite of notice, therefore, we decided to proceed exparte.

5.

We have carefully perused the orders of the authorities below. We find that in none of the appeal mentioned here-in-above the assessee or her authorized representative appeared before the AO and also none appeared before the first appellate authority. Even before us no one cared to appear inspite of notice.

6.

A perusal of the orders show that for each fault reasonable opportunity was given to the assessee to defend herself but the assessee failed to make any submission and, therefore, the respective penalties were levied by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A).

7.

We do not find any error or infirmity in the order of the CIT(A). All the captioned appeals are accordingly dismissed.

8.

Decision announced in the open court on 04.08.2022.