High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 03 KL CK 0010

Muhammed Nizar And Ors vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 1 March 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ashok Menon, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 2091 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 391 words
1.

The applicants in the above aforesaid applications are the same persons. B.A.No.2091 of 2021 pertains to Crime No.19 of 2021 of Nattukal Police

Station, while B.A.No.2092 of 2021 pertains to Crime No.16 of 2021 of the same Police Station. The prosecution case, in brief, is this:

2.

On 22.01.2021, at about 8.30 PM, the applicants allegedly broke open the house of the defacto complainant at Kunnumpuram and committed theft

of Rs.8,500/- from there and thus committed the offences punishable under Sections 457 and 380 of the IPC. On the very same day, they allegedly

robbed the DVR of the CCTV attached to that house worth Rs.15,000/- and thus committed the offences punishable under Sections 457, 461 and 480

of the IPC, in consequence of which, the 2nd crime was also registered. The applicants state that on 25.01.2021, they had returned these articles to

the defacto complainant and in consequence of that, the defacto complainant made a complaint to the Police and the crimes were registered. The

applicants state that they are innocent and that they do not have any criminal antecedents. The recovery of the stolen articles have already detected.

And, therefore, further custodial interrogation of the applicants or their detention may not be necessary. And, hence, seek bail in both the cases.

3.

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicants and the learned Public Prosecutor. The learned Public Prosecutor admits that the applicants

have no criminal antecedents. The recovery of the stolen articles is already completed. Hence, further detention of the applicants does not seem to be

essential.

4.

In the result, both the applications are allowed and the applicants are directed to be released on bail on the execution of bonds for Rs.50,000/-

(Rupees Fifty thousand only), each in each of the cases, with two solvent sureties, each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional

court and on following further conditions:

(i) They shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when called for.

(ii) They shall not intimidate or influence witnesses and tamper with evidence.

(iii) They shall not get involved in similar offences during the currency of the bail period.

In case of breach of any of the bail conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to apply for cancellation of the bail before the jurisdictional court.

The bail applications are allowed.