High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 06 KL CK 0307

Muhammed Ismail vs Sabeena

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 22 June 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
P.Somarajan, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
OP(CRL.) NO. 213 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 205 words

P.Somarajan, J

1.

The application under Article 227 of Constitution of India challenging Ext.P5 order granting interim maintenance. It was contended that the counter

submitted was not properly considered by the trial court, but passed an order of interim maintenance without going into the merits and demerits of the

case.

2.

In so far as interim maintenance is concerned, the two crucial aspects to be considered are whether there is a legally wedded relationship between

the parties and the paternity of the child, apart from the question whether the respondent wife could be able to maintain herself. The marriage is

admitted. There is no dispute between the parties regarding the marriage and the paternity of the child. The respondent has no case that she is having

other means of livelihood and no material placed along with the counter except the bare allegations. The respondent wife is entitled to a standard of

living, which she had accustomed while in company of petitioner. The amount ordered comes to Rs.7,500/- to the wife and Rs.5,000/- to the second

respondent, child.

As such, the original petition has to be dismissed in limine. I do so.

The Registry shall send a copy of this judgment to the lower court forthwith.