AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
The petitioner intends to ply an autorikshaw. For the
said purpose, he has approached the second respondent with
an application for grant of a contract carriage permit. The
grievance of the petitioner in the writ petition is that the
application is not being accepted by the second respondent to
be placed before the first respondent, on the ground that the
Regional Transport Authority has taken a decision to limit
contract carriage permits for operation of autorikshaws.
According to the petitioner, applications for contract carriage
permit cannot be refused to be accepted on that ground. The
petitioner, therefore, seeks appropriate directions in this
regard, in this writ petition.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as
also the learned Government Pleader.
It is now settled that restrictions of the aforesaid
nature can be imposed only by the Government and not by the
Regional Transport Authorities. In the circumstances, the writ
petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to
accept the application, if any, preferred by the petitioner for
grant of contract carriage permit. If the petitioner submits an
application for grant of contract carriage permit within two
weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment, the
same shall be disposed of by the first respondent, within four
weeks thereafter.
