High CourtsSingle Bench(2010) 09 KL CK 0295

Muhammed Ali vs Naushad Ali P.V. and Sister Superior

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 20 September 2010

HON’BLE JUDGES
M.N. Krishnan, J
CASE NUMBER
M.A.C.A. No. 390 of 2010

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 311 words

M.N. Krishnan, J.—This appeal is preferred against the award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Kozhikode in O.P. (MV) 793/08. The claimant, an owner of a car had moved an application for damages sustained on account of a collision between the car and a jeep. The claimant has claimed Rs. 85,000/ - as damages and a survey report is produced assessing the damages at Rs. 45,050/ -. Much to the dismay of everybody and as usual it has become a practice in Kozhikode Tribunal that nobody is examined, documents are not properly proved and every matter ends up in an appeal. The Tribunal allowed a depreciation of 40% and granted damages at Rs. 10,500/ -. It is seen from the materials available that the surveyor''s report is filed, there is bill for spare parts purchase and there is also an estimate of the repair. If these things can be properly proved and one is able to satisfy the conscience of the Court then certainly damages can be awarded. When the vehicle is damaged and spare parts are purchased a reasonable amount of depreciation can be reduced in the light of the latest Division Bench Ruling of this Court. So I feel that an opportunity can be given to properly put the materials on record to pass an award.

2.

Therefore the award under challenge is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the Tribunal with a direction to permit all concerned to produce documentary as well as oral evidence in support of their respective contentions and then dispose of the matter in accordance with law. Since the respondents had not chosen to appear before this Court, on appearance the appellant is directed to take out notice to them so that there can be a proper disposal of the matter. Parties are directed to appear before the Tribunal on 29.10.2010.