High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 01 KL CK 0279

Msrg G. Christudas vs University Of Kerala And Ors

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 7 January 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anil K. Narendran, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 28211 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

22 paragraphs · 466 words
1.

The petitioner, who is the Manager of a self-financing Arts and Science College, namely, Emmanuel College, Vazhichal, which is affiliated to the

1st respondent University, has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the

respondents to process Ext.P2 application dated 27.08.2020 for additional affiliation and consider the same in terms of Statutes 6 to 9 of Chapter 24 of

the Kerala University First Statutes, 1977, to commence the course from the academic year 2021-22. The petitioner has also sought for a declaration

that Ext.P2 application submitted on 03.09.2020 is to be considered as one submitted within the prescribed time, as per Section 10 of the General

Clauses Act, 1897 since the last day prescribed was a holiday and the office of the University was closed. The further relief sought for is a writ of

mandamus commanding the respondents to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 request dated 09.11.2020, within a time frame to be specified by this

Court.

2.

On 17.12.2020, when this writ petition came up for admission, the learned Standing Counsel for the University sought time to get instructions.

3.

A statement has been filed on behalf of the respondents opposing the reliefs sought for in this writ petition, wherein it is stated that the Syndicate of

the University, in its meeting held on 10.11.2020, has already approved the decision taken by the Standing Committee for Affiliation to reject the

application made by the petitioner for non payment of fees.

4.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Standing Counsel for the University representing the respondents.

5.

The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is yet to be communicated with the decision taken by the Syndicate in its

meeting held on 10.11.2020, rejecting the application for affiliation made by the petitioner.

6.

The learned Standing Counsel for the University would submit that, if not already communicated, the decision taken by the Syndicate in its meeting

held on 10.11.2020 shall be communicated to the petitioner within a period of one week from this date.

Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides, this writ petition is closed, in view of the decision taken by the

Syndicate of the 1st respondent University in its meeting held on 10.11.2020; however, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge that

decision on Ext.P2 application for additional affiliation, in appropriate proceedings. If not already communicated, the Registrar of the 1st respondent

University shall communicate the said decision of the Syndicate, to the petitioner, within a period of one week from this date.

The legal and factual contentions raised by the petitioner are left open to be raised in appropriate proceedings, at appropriate stage.