High CourtsSingle Bench(2022) 04 DEL CK 0140

M/S Travel Retail Services Pvt. Ltd vs M/S Three Vee Marketing Pvt Ltd

Delhi High Court · Decided on 19 April 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Arbitration Petition No. 356 Of 2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 217 words

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J

1.

Petitioner seeks reference of disputes to Arbitration in accordance with the Sub-Licence Agreement dated 04.12.2018.

2.

Learned counsel for the respondent submits that petitioner has not taken the requisite pre arbitration steps. This is disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner who submits that efforts were made to reconcile, some proposals were also exchanged, however,  respondent did not honour their offer and consequently the petitioner was constrained to approach this Court.

3.

Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that respondent also has certain counter claims which are in the process of being computed.

4.

Without prejudice to the above, learned counsel for the parties pray that the disputes be referred to arbitration.

5.

With the consent of the parties and without prejudice to their rights and contentions, Mr. Dalip Mehra, Advocate (Mobile No. +91 9811084919; Email: [email protected] ) is appointed as the sole Arbitrator. The Arbitral tribunal shall adjudicate the claims and counter claims, if any, between the parties.

6.

The fees of the learned Arbitrator shall be as per the Fourth Schedule of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

7.

Arbitrator shall furnish the requisite disclosure under section 12 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 within two weeks of entering reference.

8.

Petition is disposed of in the above terms.