Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench(2022) 11 DRAT CK 0034

M/s. SREI Equipment Finance Ltd vs M/s. Nirmal Lifestyle Ltd. & Ors

Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 14 November 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ashok Menon, Chairperson
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Misc. Appeal No. 126 Of 2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 268 words

Ashok Menon, Chairperson

1.

The Appellant is in Appeal, a financial institution impugns the order in I.A. No. 1861/2022 in S.A. No. 240/2022 on the files of the D.R.T.II, Mumbai dated 11.08.2022 wherein an ad -interim relief was granted in favour of the applicant in the S.A. preventing the Appellants from proceeding ahead with the Sarfaesi measures initiated against the Respondents.

2.

The prima facie finding of the learned Presiding Officer was that the NPA classification is improper, the notice u/s 13 (2), and the mandatory provision u/s 13 (3) of the SARAESI Act were also flawed or infringed.

3.

On going through the impugned order, I find that the finding is on a prima facie assessment, and the contentions in defiance raised by the Appellant herein have not been considered in detail. Being a prima facie finding made for the purpose of granting an Ad -interim order, it would definitely not influence the findings when the S.A. is ultimately taken up for hearing and disposal.

4.

Under the circumstances I find that the interests of justice would be served in disposing of this Appeal with a direction to the D.R.T. to dispose of the S.A. itself as expeditiously as possible at any rate within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this order.

5.

Whatever is observed in the impugned order on prima facie findings, should not preclude the Ld. P.O. from considering the issues afresh. I make it clear that I am not entering into the merits of this case and all the contentions are left open for consideration in the S.A.