Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2014) 01 CESTAT CK 0003

M/s. Snehil Kumar & Associates vs Commissioner Of Customs & Central Excise, Jaipur

Customs, Excise And Service Tax Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 3 January 2014

HON’BLE JUDGES
Archana Wadhwa, J · Rakesh Kumar, Technical Member
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Service Tax Appeal No. 2014 Of 2012

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 191 words
1.

The short issue involved in the present appeal is as to whether the actual traveling expenses initially incurred by the appellant which is a registered Service provider under the category of Consulting Engineers are required to be added in the assessable value of the service or not when the same reimbursed We find that issue stand covered by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court decision in the case of Intercontinental Consultants & Technocrats Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India reported as [2013 (29) STR 9 (Del)]. By following the same, we set aside the impugned order confirming demand and imposing penalty and allow the appeal with consequential relief to the appellant.

2.

Apart from that, we find that a major part of the impugned order is barred by limitation having been raised by way of show cause notice dated 24.10.2010 for the period from 2005-2006 to 2009 - 2010. By relying upon the Tribunal's decision in the case of Scott Wilson Kirkpatrick India Pvt. Ltd. vs. CCE, Jaipur [2013 (30) STR 652 (Tri-Del)], demand is also required to be held as barred by limitation.

(Dictated and Pronounced in the open court)