High CourtsSingle Bench(2025) 04 DEL CK 1025

M/s Singh Finlease Pvt. Ltd vs State Of Nct Of Delhi & Ors

Delhi High Court · Decided on 17 April 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
Girish Kathpalia, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (Crl) No. 4053 Of 2024 & Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 39091 Of 2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 272 words

Girish Kathpalia, J

1.

The petitioner seeks following reliefs:

“(i) To  issue  a  writ,  order,  or  direction  in  the  nature  of mandamus, directing Respondent take appropriate action in FIR No. 1210 dated 07.12.2023 lodged under section 420/467/468/120B/34 of IPC at P.S. Mangolpuri to conclude the investigation within shortest possible time;

(ii) Issue a writ, in terms of appropriate direction to prevent Respondents No. 2 to 10 from leaving the country or disposing further the mortgaged property i.e. “a freehold built-up third floor with roof rights, located at House No. B-75 (Plot No. 75, Block B), measuring 140 sq.m in the layout of DDA Colony, New Jafrabad (West Gorakh Park Extension),Illaqa Shahdara, Delhi 110032 until investigations concludes; and/or

(iii) Pass any order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case.”

2.

So far as prayer clause (i) is concerned, the learned counsel for respondents on instructions of Investigating Officer/Inspr. Suneet Siddhu submits that out of six accused persons, two have been arrested and remaining are absconding, so efforts are being done to trace them out. On instructions of Investigating Officer, learned counsel for respondents assures that investigation would be concluded within shortest possible time, as sought by the petitioner.

3.

So far as the prayer clause (ii) is concerned, learned counsel for petitioner does not press the same with liberty to approach the Civil Court for the relief to prevent further disposal of mortgaged property.

4.

In the above circumstances as requested by both sides, the petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to approach Civil Court for appropriate remedy.