Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench(2022) 05 DRAT CK 0013

M/s. Samrat Wines & Ors vs HDB Financial Services Ltd

Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 17 May 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ashok Menon, Chairperson
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
I.A. No. 147 Of 2022 In Misc. Appeal No. 51 Of 2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 516 words

Ashok Menon, Chairperson

1.

The matter is taken up for hearing by way of Praecipe dated 18. 04.2022 filed by Appellants for seeking urgent relief.

2.

Heard learned counsel for Appellants and the Respondent on the application filed for a waiver of pre-deposit u/s 18(1) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the SARFAESI Act).

3.

It is submitted that the amount mentioned in notice dated 17. 01.2018 issued u/s 13 (2) is Rs.6,10,56,208/-. Appellants submit that subsequent to receipt of above notice, Appellants have paid Rs.3.65 Crores and this amount has to be taken into account for deciding the pre-deposit amount and, therefore, a very small amount needs to be deposited for entertaining this Appeal.

4.

The learned counsel appearing for Respondent submits that Appellant has to pay 50% of the entire amount together with accrued interest for entertaining their Appeal. If the amount, which they have paid consequent to issuance of the notice, is to be accounted for then the interest which has accrued subsequently will have to be added to and then, the outstanding amount comes to around Rs.7 Crores.

5.

I am not going into nitty-gritty of the payments made. The Appellants, even after filing of Writ Petition before the Hon’ble High Court, have paid Rs.1 Crore and, therefore, prima facie there appears to some earnest attempts of making the payment.

6.

Learned counsel for Appellants submitted that the Appellants were running a Wine Shop for which the loan was taken, and they had to shut it down because of the subsequent stand taken by the Government that the distance between a Liquor Shop and the National High Way should not be less than 500 meters. This is something which came on the way of the Appellants from continuing with the business after availing the loan resulting in default of payment. Therefore, it was not a deliberate attempt on the part of the Appellants to refrain from payments.

7.

Taking all these points into the consideration and on hearing arguments of the learned counsel on either sides, I direct the Appellants to deposit a sum of Rs.85 Lakhs in two instalments u/s 18 (1) of the SARFAESI Act as pre-deposit for entertaining this Appeal. From out of this amount Rs.40 Lakhs shall be deposited on or before 19.05.2022, and balance amount shall be deposited on or before 02.06.2022.

8.

On payment of first installment within the stipulated time, there shall be a stay of further proceedings till 02.06.2022. In case of default in any of the above referred deposits, the Appeal stands dismissed automatically.

9.

The above amount shall be deposited in the form of a Demand Draft with the Registrar of this Tribunal.

10.

As and when the said amounts are deposited, it shall be invested in term deposits in the name of Registrar, DRAT, Mumbai, with any nationalized bank, initially for a period of 13 months and thereafter it will be renewed periodically.

11.

Post on 19.05.2022 for reporting compliance with regard to payment of the first installment.