High CourtsDivision Bench(2022) 01 OHC CK 0014

M/s. Ruby Associates, Pvt. Ltd., Jajpur vs Central Board Of Direct Taxes, New Delhi And Others

Orissa High Court · Decided on 4 January 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr. S. Muralidhar, CJ · R. K. Pattanaik, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 41826 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 202 words

W.P.(C) No. 41826 of 2021 and I.A. No.19395 of 2021

1.

The matter is taken up by a separate notice.

2.

Mr. T. K. Satapathy, learned Senior Standing Counsel of Income Tax Department enters appearance for Opposite Party Nos.1 to 5 and files his

appearance memo in Court today, which is taken on record.

3.

The Petitioner contends that there is violation of Section 148-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’) and also that the proceedings are time

barred. The competency of the officer who issued notice under Section 148 of the Act is also questioned.

4.

Issue notice.

5.

Mr. T. K. Satapathy, learned Senior Standing Counsel (Income Tax) accepts notice on behalf of the Opposite Parties. No notice need be issued to

them. Extra copies of the petition be served on him within three days.

6.

Till the next date of hearing, no further proceeding pursuant to the impugned notice shall take place.

7.

List on 24th January, 2022. Replies be filed within two weeks. Rejoinder thereto, if any, be filed before the next date.

8.

Record of re-assessment be produced before the next date.

9.

An urgent certified copy of this order be issued as per rules.

……………………………………..