High CourtsDivision Bench(2022) 04 DEL CK 0064

M/S R. B. Santani vs Commissioner Of Delhi Value Added Tax And Anr

Delhi High Court · Decided on 6 April 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajiv Shakdher, J · Poonam A. Bamba, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 11470 Of 2019

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 369 words

Rajiv Shakdher, J

1.

The substantive prayers made in the writ petition are as follows :

“(a) Issue writ of mandamus and certiorari or any other writ directing the Respondent 1 and Respondent No. 2 to allow the petitioner to revise its return for 3rd quarter and 4th quarter of 2016-2017 to the extent that the purchase mentioned in column C forms could be made in column of F Form or the Respondent rectify the mistake of the petitioner their self.

(b) In the alternative, the Respondent I be directed to issue F form instead of C form of 3rd quarter and 4th quarter for Assessment Year 2016-2017 to the amount of Rs. 10,885,365/- and 20,960,544/-to the Petitioner.”

2.

Counsel for the parties inform us that the issue raised in the writ petition is covered by various judgments of this court, including the order dated 10.09.2018, passed in W.P.(C.)No. 9474/2018, titled Allied Automation Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Trade & Taxes.

2.1 The above-referenced order has been passed by the Division Bench headed by Hon’ble Mr Justice S. Ravindra Bhat [as he then was]. The following operative directions were issued via order dated 10.09.2018:

“In the light of the submissions made following the final judgment of this court of 11.04.2017 in W.P. (C) 2633/2017 (Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. vs. Commissioner, VAT Delhi), the petitioners are entitled to a direction of similar kind. The respondent shall release the C-Forms to enable the appropriate correction to be made for the relevant quarters. However, these directions shall remain suspended till the time SLP (C) 13928/2018 is pending and shall be subject to the final decision of the Supreme Court in that case.

The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms."

3.

In view of the order passed in Allied Automation Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd., the respondents are directed to release “F” Forms to enable appropriate corrections to be made for the concerned period.

3.1. It is made clear that this direction will remain suspended, till a decision is rendered in SLP(C.) No.13928/2018, and will be subject to the final decision of the Supreme Court in that case.

4.

The writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.