Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench(2016) 03 CESTAT CK 0005

M/s. New Field Detergents Pvt. Ltd. vs C.C.E., Jaipur - I

Customs, Excise And Service Tax Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 28 March 2016

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.K. Mohanty, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Excise Appeal No. 2303 Of 2011

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

18 paragraphs · 360 words
1.

This appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 21.06.2011 passed by the Commissioner, Customs and Central Excise (Appeals-I), Jaipur.

Brief facts of the case are that the Department initiated Show Cause proceedings against the appellant on the basis of verification of record vis-a-vis

the availability of goods in the factory. The Department detected that the appellant had not properly accounted for the manufactured goods in the

Daily Stock Account i.e. RG-I register. It is also observed that there is shortage/ excess of finished goods and raw material as compared to the

accounts maintained by the appellant. The SCN was adjudicating vide order dated 10.01.2011, wherein the seized goods were confiscated and option

was given to the appellant to redeem the same on payment of redemption file of Rs.20,000/-. Further, Central Excise Duty demand of Rs.45,207/- was

confirmed against the clandestine clearance of the finished goods and raw material along with the interest. Besides, equal amount of penalty of

Rs.45,207/- was imposed on the appellant under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Appeal filed against the adjudication order was upheld

by the ld. Commissioner (Appeals) vide impugned order dated 21.06.2011. Hence the appellant is before the Tribunal.

2.

Heard both sides and perused the case records.

3.

On perusal of the case records, I find that the appellant has not furnished any justifiable reason to negate the case of Revenue that the goods were

not clandestinely removed from the factory without payment of Central Excise duty. Further, the appellant has also not furnished any valid reason for

non maintenance of its statutory records properly. Thus, I am of the view that the duty demand confirmed by the authorities below and imposition of

penalty are in conformity with the statutory provisions. However, considering the fact that duty demand on the excess/ shortage in goods was

confirmed, imposition of redemption file of Rs.20,000/- on the seized goods valued at Rs.62,581/- is in the higher side, which can be reduced in the

interest of justice. Thus, the redemption file is reduced from Rs.20,000/- to Rs.5,000/-

4.

The appeal is disposed of in above terms.

(Operative Portion pronounced in open court)