High CourtsSingle Bench(2017) 11 DEL CK 0486

M/S National Institute Of Food Technology Enterpreneurship And Management (NIFTEM) vs Govt Of Nct Of Delhi And Anr

Delhi High Court · Decided on 14 November 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Chander Shekhar, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 11347 Of 2016, Civil Miscellaneous No. 44444 Of 2016

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

27 paragraphs · 513 words

Chander Shekhar, J

1.

By this Writ Petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of the impugned reference being order dated 06.05.2015 in File No. F-24(183)/Lab/

SD/2015/7890 passed by the Deputy Labour Commissioner, The Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi, Labour Department, Office of the

Deputy Labour Commissioner (South District), whereby, the learned Deputy Labour Commissioner has referred the dispute to the Labour Court.

2.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been set up by the Ministry of Food Processing Industries, Government of India

as an autonomous institute registered under Societies Registration Act, 1860 on 19th May, 2010. Prior to this, i.e. in the month of August, 2007, its

status was that of a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956. At that time, its Registered Office was AMDA Building, 7/6, Siri Fort

Institutional Area, August Kranti Marg, New Delhi-110049. The same was shifted to Plot No. 97, Sector-56, HSIIDC Industrial Estate, Kundli,

Sonepat-131028, Haryana, on 6th June, 2011 and since then it is functional there only. Accordingly, all the employees including outsourced ones were

transferred to the Kundli Office and that there is no office of petitioner at 208, Panchsheel Bhawan, August Kranti Marg, New Delhi-110049 as

specified in the impugned reference being order dated 06.05.2015.

3.

Learned counsel also submitted that the Labour Court has failed to take into consideration the question regarding territorial jurisdiction, despite

specifying the same in their oral and written submissions before the Deputy Labour Commissioner.

4.

He further submitted that if an opportunity is granted to move an application for framing of an additional issue, the matter may be disposed of.

5.

Learned Additional Standing Counsel for respondent No.1/GNCTD submitted that there is no bar for moving the said application before the Labour

Court, subject to pleadings in this respect.

6.

Learned ASC also submitted that in case such an application for framing of an additional issue is moved before the Labour Court regarding the

territorial jurisdiction, the same may be decided by the Labour Court on merits.

7.

In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels for the parties, the present petition is disposed of with the direction to the parties to appear

before the Labour Court, with the liberty to the petitioner to move an appropriate application for framing of an additional issue regarding the territorial

jurisdiction before the Labour Court and the same be decided as per law. The interim order stands vacated. The Labour Court may decide the same

as per law after giving an opportunity of hearing to the parties.

8.

It is informed by the parties that the case is fixed for tomorrow, i.e. 15.11.2017. The parties are directed to appear before the Labour Court on the

date already fixed. However, the petitioner is granted four weeks time to move an appropriate application, to which no objection is raised by learned

counsels for the respondents.

9.

The present petition is disposed of accordingly. Pending application also stands disposed of. Labour court record be returned back.

10.

Labour Court shall proceed further in accordance with law.