High CourtsSingle Bench(2000) 10 P&H CK 0048

M/s. Makkar Cotton Mills vs Harmander Singh

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 18 October 2000 · Citation: (2001) 1 CivCC 656 : (2001) 1 RCR(Civil) 47

HON’BLE JUDGES
R.L. Anand, J
CASE NUMBER
C.R. No. 4321 of 1999

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 196 words

R.L. Anand, J.—Counsel for the petitioners relies upon a judgment of this Court reported in Bank Bandhu Co-op. Group Society v. M/s. Manasvi Construction Engineers and Conlrticlars 1999(3) PLK 850 :1999(4) RRR 205 (P&H), and submits that there was an arbitration clause between the parties and, in these circumstances, the respondents were bound by the said arbitration clause and the matter was liable to be referred to the Arbitrator u/s 8 of the New Arbitration Act.

2.

On the contrary, counsel for the respondents relies upon a judgment of the Hon''ble Supreme Court reported in Haryana Telecom Ltd. v. Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd. 1999(3) RCR 619, and submits that in a suit for dissolution of the partnership and rendition of accounts, this aspect of the case has to be adjudicated by the court itself and not by the Arbitrator.

3.

In view of the judgment of the Hon''ble Supreme Court and by distinguishing the judgment relied upon by the counsel for the petitioners, 1 am of the considered opinion that the present revision petition must fail and I do not sc any illegality or impropriety in the impugned order.

4.

No merit. Dismissed.

5.

Petition dismissed.