High CourtsDivision Bench(2020) 09 PAT CK 0282

M/S Mahi Enterprises vs State Of Bihar And Ors

Patna High Court · Decided on 23 September 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjay Karol, CJ · S. Kumar, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3746 Of 2011

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

18 paragraphs · 336 words

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):

“(i) For a declaration that the Bihar Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas for Consumption, Use or Sale therein [Amendment & Validation] Act,

2008 [Act No.13/2008 dt. 15.04.2008] [Annexure-3] being enforced with retrospective effect from 29.8.2006 as ultravires Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 246,

301 & 304 of the Constitution of India;

(ii) For a declaration that the rate of Entry-tax on any of the Scheduled Commodity to the extent exceeding the Rate of Bihar VAT is discriminatory,

and the Notification-SO No.95 dt. 31.07.2008 prescribing the rate on Tobacco Products being 16% against the rate of Tobacco Products under the

Bihar VAT being 12.5% is liable to be declared to be ultravires;

(iii) For quashing of the Notification SO No.95 dt. 31.07.2008 [Annexure-4] issued u/s 3(1) of the Bihar Tax on Entries of Goods into the Local Areas

for consumption, use or sale therein Act, 1993, and being enforced with retrospective effect from 01.04.2008, by which rates of entry tax have been

fixed for the scheduled goods from 2% to 16% on their entry into a local area for consumption, use or sale therein for the purported purpose of

development of trade, commerce and industries in the State.

(iv) For issuance of an appropriate writ(s), or order(s) or direction(s) to the respondents for restraining them from making any demand of entry tax

from the petitioner on the import of Tobacco Products in the local areas of the State of Bihar; and for any other relief[s] for which the petitioner may

legally be found entitled to in the facts and circumstances of the present case.â€​

Shri S.D. Sanjay, learned senior counsel fairly states that with the passage of time the present petition has become infructuous, inasmuch as the

petitioner has already taken recourse to the mechanism of settlement of disputes through an alternate mode. However, he prays that petitioner be

granted liberty to agitate the issue afresh, if so required and desired.

Petition stands disposed of with the liberty aforesaid.