High CourtsDIVISION BENCH(2017) 12 PAT CK 0031

M/s Kohinoor Boot House vs The State of Bihar

Patna High Court · Decided on 18 December 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
RESULT
Disposed off
CASE NUMBER
17606 of 2016

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

25 paragraphs · 224 words
1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

counsel for the State.

2.

Prima facie we are satisfied that the petitioner was

not given proper opportunity to either explain himself or defend

himself on the question of the liability which has been created in

terms of the order dated 25.01.2016 purportedly passed under

Section 33 of the Bihar Value Added Tax, 2005. The order itself

indicates that it is ex parte order, and therefore, in the interest of

fair play, the impugned order dated 25.01.2016, fixing a liability

of Rs. 10,99,949.00, as now the consequential notice No. 126

dated 27.01.2016 passed by the Commercial Tax Officer, Buxar

under Section 31 & 39 of the Bihar Value Added Tax, is also set

aside.

3.

The petitioner will appear before the Assistant

Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Buxar Circle, Buxar with a

copy of this order on the 4th of January, 2018. The Assistant

Commissioner, thereafter, will fix a date for hearing of the

matter in which the petitioner shall render full cooperation and

will not try to play games by seeking frivolous adjournment or

avoid proper assistance in the adjudication. The decision,

thereafter, will be rendered on the deliberation and the

explanation which the petitioner will have to offer before the

said authority.

4.

The writ application is disposed off with the above

leeway and direction.