High CourtsDIVISION BENCH(2017) 03 MAD CK 0019

M/s. Kansai Nerolac Paints Limited vs M/s. Prateesh Engineering Enterprises, & Ors.

Madras High Court · Decided on 21 March 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Nooty. Ramamohana Rao, S.M.Subramaniam
CASE NUMBER
56 of 2017 and C M P Nos 4715 and 4716 of 2017

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

31 paragraphs · 556 words
1.

This Original Side Appeal is instituted, calling in question, the correctness of the order passed by our Learned Brother, Justice T.S.Sivagnanam

on 08.02.2017, setting aside the award passed on 27.07.2016, by the Zonal Officer, MSE Facilitation Council, Regional Joint Director of

Industries and Commerce, SIDCO Corporate Building, Chennai, and remanding the matter back for consideration afresh.

2.

While entertaining this Appeal, we had useful round of discussion with Mr.P.H, Aravind Pandian, learned Senior Counsel, who appeared on

behalf of M/s.Shardul Amarchandmangaldas and Company, the learned counsel for the appellant, and also with Mr.R.Parthasarathy, the learned

counsel, who appeared on behalf of the first respondent, Small Scale Industries Entrepreneur, who has approached MSE Facilitation Council for

securing payments due and payable to it by the appellant before us. The dispute in between the parties, lied in a very narrow campus. We,

therefore, suggested to the appellant, who is a leading industrial Entrepreneur to sort out the dispute amicably, keeping in view, the very purpose

and object behind the establishment of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises. Accordingly, both sides have returned to the negotiating table, and

consequently, the dispute that has emanated and kept pending between the parties has been settled to their mutual satisfaction on 16th of March,

2017. Accordingly, a joint Memorandum of reducing the terms of settlement into the writing, duly signed by both the appellant and the 1st

respondent as well as their respective learned counsel has been filed into the Court today, which Memorandum of Settlement drawn and filed into

the Court, has been accepted by us.

3.

We, very happily record our full satisfaction and appreciation for the wonderful efforts put in by the learned counsel appearing on both sides,

and also the spirit of compromise exhibited by both sides.

4.

In that view of the matter, we dispose of this Original Side Appeal, by passing a decree in Terms of Compromise/Memorandum of Settlement

arrived at by and between the parties, as noted down in the joint Memo filed into the Court today. Accordingly, the dispute between the parties

shall stand settled in accordance with and in terms thereof. This Memorandum of Settlement shall form part of the decree. No costs. Consequently,

the Civil Miscellaneous Petition No.4715 of 2017 is closed.

C.M.P.No.4716 of 2017 in O.S.A.No. 56 of 2017

1.

This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed, seeking appropriate direction to the Registrar General, High Court, Madras, to refund a sum of

Rs.1,91,44,378/-(Rupees One Crore Ninety One Lakhs Forty Four Thousand Three Hundred and Seventy Eighty Only) deposited by the

petitioner/appellant to them.

2.

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties.

3.

Pursuant to the order, dated 08.02.2017 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court, in Original Petition No.953 of 2016, the

petitioner/appellant has deposited the afore said sum before the Registrar General, High Court on 22.11.2016, and said amount has been

deposited by the Registrar General in the Indian Bank, High Court Branch, in a Fixed Deposit, an interest bearing account. Hence, the Registrar

General, High Court is directed to withdraw the said amount lying in Fixed Deposit with the Indian Bank, High Court Branch, and return the same

to the petitioner/appellant together with interest earned so far, after obtaining proper acknowledgement from the counsel appearing for the

appellant.

4.

This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered accordingly.