High CourtsDIVISON BENCH(2017) 07 BOM CK 0207

M/s Ira Exotica Private Limited vs State of Goa, through Chief Secretary, & Ors.

Bombay High Court · Decided on 3 July 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
F. M. Reis, Nutan D. Sardessai
CASE NUMBER
778 of 2015

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 378 words
1.

Heard Mr. Shivan Desai, leaned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr. P. Dangui, learned Government Advocate appering for the respondent nos. 1 to 7, Ms. Aparna Naik, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.8 and Mr. Nigel Da Costa Frias, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.9.

2.

The challenge in the above petition is to the revocation of the technical approval granted by the respondent no.2 dated 29.09.2015 on the ground that the subject property is not surfaced by a road along with the requisite width from the existing 8 metres wide access leading to such property.

3.

Mr. S. Dessai, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner points out that in terms of clause 6A.4(16) of the Goa Land Development and Building Construction Regulations, 2010 the petitioner is entitled for relaxation from the respondent no.2 and as such the petitioner shall file an appropriate application with that regard to the respondent no.2 satisfying them that the petitioner is entitled for such relaxation. The learned counsel further points out that the application to that effect shall be filed within one week from today.

4.

Mr. Nigel Da Costa Frias, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.9 however disputes the said contention and points out that the petitioner is not entitled for such relaxation.

5.

Mr. P. Dangui, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent nos. 1 to 7 however submits that in case such application is filed, the respondent no.2 shall examine the application on its own merits and reexamine the withdrawal of suspension of the revocation of the technical approval on its own merits in accordance with law.

6.

In view of the above, we dispose of the above petition by granting liberty to the petitioner to file an application in terms of clause 6A.4(16) of the Goa Land Development and Building Construction Regulations, 2010 which the respondent no.2 shall examine with all other issues concerning the technical approval on its own merits in the light of the observations made herein above after hearing the parties in accordance with law within three months from today. All contentions of parties with that regard are left open to be examined on its own merits. Rule is made absolute in the above terms. The petition stands disposed of accordingly.