High CourtsDivision Bench(2018) 02 DEL CK 0252

M/S. H. K. International vs Union Of India And Ors

Delhi High Court · Decided on 7 February 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
G.S.Sistani, J · Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 10367 Of 2015

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 353 words

G. S. Sistani, J

1.

The present petition relates to Khasra No. 2 Min land measuring 2 Bigha and 1 biswa situated in the revenue estate of Village Shyoor Pur, Tehsil

Mehrauli, Delhi.

2.

The challenge is laid to a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) dated

25.11.1980 and a notification under Section 6 of the Act dated 20.05.1985.

3.

Counter affidavit has been handed over by learned counsel for the LAC in Court today. Copy supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. Counter

affidavit is taken on record.

4.

With the consent of the parties, the present writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.

5.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the stand taken by the LAC in para 5 of the counter affidavit, no further orders are

required to be passed in the present writ petition.

6.

Para 5 of the counter affidavit filed by the LAC, reads as under:

“That due to status quo granted in W.P.(C) 1444/86 titled as M/s. H. K. International Vs. Union of India, the land of Khasra No. 2 min

was not acquired. While making award No. 10/87-88, the above mentioned Khasra No. was left out and the said land was not acquired by

the said award. In this way, the present writ petition is liable to be dismissed as the acquisition proceedings for the subject land were not

completed by making an award.â€​

7.

As per para 5 of the counter affidavit, while making the Award No. 10/87-88, the Khasra number which is subject matter of the present writ

petition was left out and the land was not acquired.

8.

In view of the stand taken by the LAC in para 5 of the counter affidavit which has been reproduced above, counsel for the petitioner submits that

the notification under Section 4 dated 25.11.1980 and notification under Section 6 dated 20.05.1985 are deemed to have lapsed and thus no further

orders are required to be passed.

9.

The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms.