High CourtsDivision Bench(2006) 09 P&H CK 0165

Ms. Garima Sahni vs Baba Farid University and Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 1 September 2006

HON’BLE JUDGES
Viney Mittal, J · H.S. Bhalla, J
CASE NUMBER
C.W.P No. 10986 of 2006

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

18 paragraphs · 373 words

Viney Mittal, J.—A sealed cover has been produced before us by Sh. Anupam Gupta, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent-

University forwarded by the Director, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh containing the report of the re-

evaluation of the answer sheets of the petitioner in terms of the order dated August 11, 2006 passed by this Court. The aforesaid sealed cover has

been opened in the presence of the petitioner. The sealed cover contains two evaluation sheets of the answer sheets of the petitioner with regard to

her paper in the subject of Periodontology, BDS, Final Prof. of the examination held in May 2006. The aforesaid evaluation reports indicate that

the petitioner has obtained 27 marks in Part-1 out of a total of 45 marks and 27 marks in Part- II out of a total of 45 marks from one examiner.

The second examiner has chosen to award 27 marks for Part-I whereas 25 marks have been awarded for Part-II . It has been very fairly informed

by Sh. Anupam Gupta that besides the aforesaid marks the petitioner shall also be entitled to the internal assessment marks which were originally

awarded by the University as well as the marks for her practical examinations.

2.

In view of the aforesaid marks, it is apparent that the petitioner has scored marks which are sufficient for passing the Examination. For the

detailed reasons to be recorded separately, the respondent-University is directed to declare the result of the petitioner, keeping in view the

aforesaid re-evaluation, taking the average of the marks by the two evaluators from PGIMER. The result of the petitioner shall be declared by the

respondent-University within a period of one week from today.

3.

Keeping in view the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, we also request the Vice-Chancellor, Baba Farid University of Health

Sciences to allow the petitioner to join the internship on the strength of the declaration of the result. The petitioner shall also be entitled to pursue

her further career in accordance with law. Original reports submitted by the evaluators of PGIMER have been returned back to Sh. Anupam

Gupta, Advocate.

4.

A copy of the order be given dasti under the signatures of the Bench Secretary.