High CourtsDivision Bench(2022) 08 OHC CK 0133

M/s. Express Publication (Madurai) Ltd., Bhubaneswar vs State Of Orissa, Represented By The Commissioner Of Sales Tax

Orissa High Court · Decided on 16 August 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr. S. Muralidhar, CJ · Chittaranjan Dash, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
STREV No. 2 Of 2012

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 269 words
1.

This is the Assessee’s revision petition arising out of an order dated 19th August 2011, passed by the Orissa Sales Tax Tribunal, Cuttack in S.A. No.229 (ET) of 2007-08 for the period of 2000-01. This is the matter arising under the Orissa Entry Tax Act, 1999 (OET Act).

2.

Admit.

3.

The following two questions are framed for consideration:

“(i) whether in the facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view of the matter the reopening of the assessment basing on A.G. report and completion of reassessment without issue of notice to rebut the allegation if any was permissible and legally correct to hold that “production and or manufacturing of News Paper out of materials was not an activity of Manufacturing and processing of new identifiable goods?

(ii) Whether the re-assessment has been correctly completed denying the manufacturing and processing of goods out of the consumables brought out the manufacturing of News Paper held previously was under the scheme of change of opinion?

4.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties, the Court is satisfied to the above questions stand answered in favour of the Petitioner and against the Department by the Judgment of the Supreme Court in Printers (Mysore) Ltd. and another v. Assistant Commercial Tax Officer and others (1994) 93 STC Page-95 (SC).

5.

In that view of the matter, the questions are answered in favour of the Petitioner and against the Department and the impugned order of the Tribunal and corresponding orders to the ACST and STO are hereby set aside.

6.

The revision petition is disposed of in the above terms.

…………………………….