CourtKutchehry.com
High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 12 DEL CK 0033

M/S Bvg-Uksas Ems Private Limited vs Centralised Accident & Trauma Services

Delhi High Court · Decided on 6 December 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vinod Goel, J
RESULT
Disposed Off
CASE NUMBER
First Appeal from Order No. 352 Of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 329 words

C.M. No.30479/2018, 30480/2018 & 30481/2018 (for exemption)

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

The applications stand disposed of.

C.M. No.51233/2018 (for delay)

For the reasons explained in the application, delay in filing the affidavit is condoned. The application stands disposed of.

F.A.O. No.352/2018

1.

Mr. Ramesh Singh, Standing Counsel for the Government of NCT of Delhi, submits that in terms of their earlier letter dated 11.09.2018, the appellant has not provided the information detailed at serial Nos.1, 2, 4, 9, 10, 11, 16 & 17. He further points out that on detailed scrutiny of the matter, they have issued another letter dated 30.11.2018, a copy of which has been placed on record today, whereby certain additional information was sought from the appellant. He submits that information is still awaited.

2.

Per contra, learned counsel for the appellant submits that each and every information contained not only in the letter dated 11.09.2018 but also in the letter dated 30.11.2018 has been supplied by the appellant to the respondent but still the release of 30 per cent of the payment is being withheld by the respondent.

3.

The learned counsel for the respondent suggests that the arbitrator may be directed to look into the aspect as to whether the appellant has complied with the requirements of letters dated 11.09.2018 and 30.11.2018 and has provided requisite information to the respondent and decide the issue of payment of 30 % to the appellant. The learned counsel for the appellant has no objection. As such, it is directed that the arbitrator shall look into the matter and examine whether the requisite information/details have been provided to the respondent and decide the aspect related to the payment of 30 per cent amount within a period of eight weeks.

4.

In view of the above directions, the appeal is not pressed by the learned counsel for the appellant and accordingly disposed off.

5.

Copy of the order be given dasti under signatures of the Private Secretary.