High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 06 UK CK 0013

M/s B.K. Industries vs State Of Uttarakhand & Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 11 June 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1060 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 362 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.

2.

Petitioner is a Small Scale Industrial Unit, which is registered under MSME Act, 2006.

3.

By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs:

“i) To issue a Writ, order or direction in the nature of ‘Mandamus’ by directing and commanding the commanding the respondent no. 3 to

allow the petitioner to in compliance of the Government Order No. 261/VII-2-14/143 -Udyog/2003 dated 19-03-2014 (Annexure no. 2) and to provide

all the necessary preferential benefits to the petitioner as per the rules framed in pursuance of the above stated Government Order.

ii) To issue a Writ, order or direction in the nature of ‘Mandamus’ by directing and commanding the commanding the respondent no. 2 for

compliance of the rules framed vide the Government Order dated 19-03-2014 (Annexure no. 2) for all Municipal Corporations and Nagar Palika

Parishad in the State of Uttarakhand.

iii) To issue a Writ, order or direction in the nature of ‘Mandamus’ by directing and commanding the commanding the respondent no. 2 to direct

the respondent no. 3 to provide preferential benefits to the petitioner in compliance of the letter no. 50/1408/2015 dated 07-04-2016.â€​

4.

After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has made a representation to respondent no. 3 (annexure no. 7 to

the writ petition), but no decision has been taken thereupon so far. He, therefore, confines his prayer and submits that necessary direction be issued to

the Competent Authority in Nagar Palika Parishad, Chinyali Saur, District Uttarkashi to decide his representation (annexure no. 7 to the writ petition)

expeditiously.

5.

Learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 3 submits that although tender have not been invited as yet by respondent no. 3, however, if petitioner

has made any such representation, the same shall be decided expeditiously.

6.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no. 3 to decide petitioner’s representation (annexure no. 7 to the writ

petition), in accordance with law, within six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order along with copy of representation.