Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench(2024) 05 DRAT CK 0009

M/s Bhoje Power Control System vs Punjab National Bank

Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 14 May 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
R. D. Khare, Chairperson
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Appeal Dy. No. 637 Of 2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 462 words

R. D. Khare, Chairperson

Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.

The present appeal has been filed under section 18 of the SARFAESI Act against the interim order dated 19.04.2024 passed by the DRT, Lucknow in S.A. No. 799/2023, whereby the interim relief application of the appellant has been rejected on the ground that the auction purchaser has not been impleaded as party.

Learned counsel for the appellant contends that this is a second round of litigation and on first round, the appeal Dy. No. 1552/2023 was filed by the appellant, which was finally disposed off by this Tribunal vide order dated 18.01.2024, copy of which has been appended at page no. 262 of paper book, whereby this Tribunal had directed that it is expected that the Tribunal below shall consider and decide the interim application expeditiously, preferably on the next date fixed before it and till disposal of the interim application, status quo with regard to the property in question was directed to be maintained by all the parties concerned.

Learned counsel for the appellant has drawn attention of this court to the impugned order, which is annexed as annexure no. 1 and has stated that the counsel for the Auction purchaser Mr. Vikram Yadav was present before the Tribunal below and had advanced his argument to the argument raised by the learned counsel for the appellant on the interim application and inspite of the same, the order impugned has been passed by the Tribunal below on the ground that unless the auction purchaser is heard, no interim relief can be granted whereas the Tribunal below has not recorded any finding on 15 days’ clear sale notice or on the auction conducted by the Bank inspite of the fact that the entire money had been deposited by the appellant and the order impugned has been passed only on the ground that without hearing the auction purchaser, no interim order can be passed and nothing has been recorded that as to why the counsel for the auction purchaser was not heard on that date i.e. 19.04.2024.

In view of the above, the impugned order dated 19.04.2024 is hereby set aside and the matter is remanded back to the Tribunal below to consider the interim application of the appellant afresh and pass the reasoned order within a month from the date of production of certified copy of this order. It is undertaken at the bar that the order of this Tribunal shall be placed before the Tribunal below within four days from today.

Till the disposal of the interim application, status quo with regard to the property in question as it exists today shall be maintained by all the parties concerned.

In view of the above, the present appeal is finally disposed off.