High CourtsDivision Bench(2014) 05 MP CK 0092

M/s. Ashok Plastic Industries Rajgarh vs Deputy Commissioner Commercial Tax

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 8 May 2014

HON’BLE JUDGES
Shantanu Kemkar, J · J.K. Jain, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Appeal No. 141/2007

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 372 words
1.

Heard.

2.

By filing this intra court appeal, the appellant has assailed the order dated 29.01.2004 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in Writ Petition No. 165/2003.

3.

The question which was raised in the writ petition was "whether PVC Pipes used in pumping sets can be held as accessories of the pumps, if so, whether they are exempted from payment of commercial tax".

4.

The commercial tax authorities had taken a view in the orders impugned before the writ Court that PVC Pipes are not accessories of the pump sets, and as such, no exemption can be extended to such item. Aggrieved, the aforesaid writ petition was filed.

5.

Learned Single Judge, after considering the law laid down in the case of Gaurav Agro Plast Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Tax, , which was upheld later on by a Division Bench reported in (2002) 35 KVN 172, dismissed the writ petition.

6.

We have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties.

7.

In the case of Gaurav Agro Plast Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax (supra) it was held that PVC Pipe used in the pumping set cannot be held to be a spare part, but an essential part of the set. This view has been upheld by the Division Bench of this Court by dismissing the LPA and thereafter this point has again been considered and the view taken in Gaurav Agro Plast has been affirmed in the case of Kothari Sales v. Commissioner of Commercial Tax MP (2008) 12 STJ 750 (MP). Thus once a finding is recorded that PVC Pipe is an essential part of the pumping set, it cannot be said to be an accessory of pumping set. In the circumstances, we find no ground to take a different view than the view, which has been taken by the learned Single Judge on the basis of the judgment passed by this Court in the case of Gaurav Agro Plast Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax (supra) upheld by the Division Bench and also in Kothari Sales v. Commissioner of Commercial Tax MP (supra).

8.

As a result, the writ appeal fails and is hereby dismissed.