Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2022) 06 ITAT CK 0009

M/s ARJ Impex Pvt Ltd vs I.T.O

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 3 June 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Saktijit Dey, J · N.K. Billaiya, (AM)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Income Tax Appeal No. 1088/DEL/2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 224 words
1.

This appeal by the assessee is preferred against the order of the ld. CIT(A) – 1, New Delhi dated 08.07.2019 pertaining to Assessment Year 2010-11.

2.

The sum and substance of the grievance of the assessee is that the ld. CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal of the assessee ex-parte in limine.

3.

Vide application dated 19.05.2022, the assessee prayed for early hearing of the appeal, as much prejudice has been caused to the assessee by an ex-parte order of the ld. CIT(A) and that too, framed in limine.

4.

The ld. DR fairly stated that the appeal may be restored to the file of the ld. CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.

5.

We have carefully perused the orders of the ld. CIT(A). We find that the ld. CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal in limine drawing support from the decision of the Hon'ble Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar Vs. CWT 223 ITR 480.

6.

In the interest of justice and fair play, we deem it fit to restore the appeal to the file of the ld. CIT(A). The ld. CIT(A) is directed to decide the appeal afresh after affording reasonable and sufficient opportunity of being heard to the assessee.

6.

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No. 1088/DEL/2022 is allowed for statistical purposes.