Tribunals and Commissions(1993) 06 NCDRC CK 0063

M.S. ANAND vs D.P. CHOPRA And OTHERS

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission · Decided on 30 June 1993 · Citation: 1994 1 CPJ 448

HON’BLE JUDGES
R.N.Mittal , S.Brar , A.N.Saxena J.
RESULT
Appeal dismissed

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 251 words
1.

THIS appeal has been filed by Shri M.S. Anand, allegedly ex-Managing Director of M/s. Anand Pratyabhoot Vit Nigam. The facts of the case are that seven decrees were obtained by Shri D.P. Chopra against M/s. Anand Pratyabhoot Vit Nigam and he made complaints u/Sec. 27 of the Consumer Protection Act against Mr. Anand. During trial Mr. Anand made an application before the Forum that he had resigned as a Managing Director and in order to prove the fact UCO Bank, South Patel Nagar, UCO Bank Arya Samaj Road and UCO Bank West Patel Nagar all situated at New Delhi in which they had filed certain resolutions, be summoned. The application of Mr. Anand was rejected by the Forum observing that he can inspect the records from the office of the Official Liquidator and obtain copies of the resolutions from there. He has come up in appeal against that order to the Commission.

2.

WE have heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant and Mr. Chopra, Respondent in person. WE do not find any infirmity in the order. The original records are stated to be in the possession of the Official Liquidator. Shri Anand can inspect the records there and obtain copies from the Official Liquidator and produce before the Forum. There are no grounds to interfere with the impugned order. It appears that the application has been made in order to delay the proceedings. Consequently, we dismiss the appeal with costs. Costs Rs. 500/-. Stay order stands vacated. Appeal dismissed.