Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench(2022) 11 DRAT CK 0030

M/s Aloki Hospital Private Ltd. & Ors. vs Indian Bank & Anr

Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 23 November 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
R. D. Khare, Chairperson
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Transfer Petition No. 03 Of 2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 349 words

R. D. Khare, Chairperson

Heard the learned counsel for the applicants.

It has been contended that there has been gross violation of the guidelines of the RBI in the procedure adopted and that no demand or sale notice was ever served upon the applicants, which is again gross contravention of provision of the SARFAESI Act. It is contended that no possession notice was ever served upon the applicants nor it was affixed on any conspicuous place of the house nor any such notice was ever published in the newspaper.

It is further contended that a clear 15/30 days prior notice prior to the sale was not given as per e-auction process and thereafter the applicants approached before the DRT, Lucknow by filing a fresh S.A. No. 531/2022 along with delay condonation application. It is further contended that in the meantime, the respondent-Bank sold the property to the successful bidder being respondent no. 2 and the DRT, Lucknow passed an order dated 06.10.2022, whereby the interim relief of the applicants was rejected illegally. It is further contended that the applicants have lost all its hope in the DRT, Lucknow as the interim relief has been rejected by the DRT, Lucknow, therefore, the present transfer application has been moved before this Tribunal for transferring the matter to the DRT, Allahabad.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he has lost all his hopes to get justice from the DRT, Lucknow merely because his interim stay application has been rejected, which argument does not find favour of this court, accordingly the transfer application is being rejected.

After hearing the learned counsel for the applicants, this court is of opinion that if the applicants have any grievance with regard to the non following the guidelines of the RBI or the procedure of the SARFAESI Act and Rules, the applicants may file appropriate application on all the grievances before the DRT, Lucknow and if such application is filed, the Tribunal below shall consider and decide the same most expeditiously in accordance with law.

In view of the above direction, the application stands disposed off.