AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
ORDER
PER SHRI L. N. GUPTA, MEMBER (T)
The present Petition is filed under the Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (‘IBC, 2016’) read with Rule 4 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016 by Mr. Surendra Kanaiyalal Shahthrough its proprietor of Shah Photo Film Company (‘Financial Creditor’), with a prayer to initiate the Corporate Insolvency process against M/s Magicon Impex Private Limited (‘Corporate Debtor’).
The Corporate Debtor M/s Magicon Impex Private Limited is a Company incorporated with CIN U32201DL2004PTC127870 on 27.07.2004 under the provisions of the erstwhile Companies Act 1956 having its registered office at B1/625, 2nd Floor, Main Road, which is within the jurisdiction of this Tribunal.
The Authorized Share Capital of the Corporate Debtor Company is Rs. 10,50,00,000/- and Paid-up Share Capital of the Company is Rs. 4,34,00,000/- as per the master data annexed with the Application.
That this Application filed under Section 7 of IBC, 2016 was listed for the first time on 10.02.2021. During the course of preliminary hearing, the Ld. Counsel for the Applicant sought time to make necessary amendments in the Part IV of the Application.
That vide order dated 15.07.2021, this Adjudicating Authority had dismissed the Application for default due to the Non-Appearance of the Applicant on 10.03.2021 and 24.03.2021 and their main counsel on 15.07.2021.
That the Applicant, then filed an IA No. 3333/2021 seeking restoration of the main Section 7 Application. The same was allowed by this Adjudicating Authority vide order dated 03.08.2021 and the petition CP(IB)-88/2021 was restored to its original file.
That the matter was heard on 10.09.2021 on the issue of maintainability of the Application under Section 7 of IBC, 2016 and whether the amount claimed by the Applicant in Part IV of the Application is covered under the definition of “Financial Debt” ?
That the following has been stated by the Applicant in the Amended Part IV of the Application, which is reproduced below :
In order to establish that the debt claimed in the Part IV of the Application is covered under the ambit of “Financial Debt” as defined under Section 5(8) of IBC, 2016, the Applicant has filed its written submission and has averred the following:
“2.That the Corporate Debtor had appointed the Financial Creditor as "Consignment and Freight Agent” and for that purpose the parties had executed an Agreement dated 25.03.2019 which is produced at Exhibit-C along with the Petition.
3.It is pertinent to note that by virtue of the aforesaid Agreement dated 25.02.2019, the Petitioner had paid and the Respondent had accepted an interest-bearing Deposit Rs.70,00,000/- (Rupee Seventy Lakhs Only). The Petitioner has produced the copies of his Bank Statement for the relevant period (Exhibit-D) showing the corresponding entries which demonstrate that the amount was transferred from the Petitioner to the Respondent. The Petitioner has also produced the copy of the ledger at Exhibit-F which reflects the relevant entries.
4.The Petitioner most respectfully submits that the term “Financial Debt” as envisaged under Sec. 5(8) of the Code. In particular Section 5(8)(f) reads as follows: Section 5(8)(f) “financial debt” means a debt alongwith interest, if any, which is disbursed against the consideration for the time value of money and includes ----
(a)… … ….
(b)… … ….
(c)… … ….
(d)… … ….
(e)Any amount raised under any other transaction, including any forward sale or purchase agreement, having the commercial effect of a borrowing, … … …
5.Thus it is very clear from the Section itself that the term “financial debt” is not restricted only to the “loan” in strict sense but in its broader connotation, it includes all kinds of transactions wherein the money is raised by a party against consideration for the time value of money. Thus what is required under the law is that there has to be “debt” and it must satisfy the criteria of “time value of money”. In the present case, it is undisputed fact that the Corporate Debtor had accepted a refundable Deposit of Rs. 70 Lakhs from the Petitioner and has agreed to pay interest thereon.
6.It is most respectfully submitted that an interest bearing refundable deposit squarely falls within the purview of “financial debt” in view of the clear mandate of Section 5(8)(f) as well as in light of the judicial pronouncements”.
Through its Written Submissions, the Financial Creditor has contended that by virtue of the Agreement dated 25.03.2019, whereby the Corporate Debtor was appointed the Applicant as “Consignment & Freight Agent”, the Applicant had paid an interest-bearing Deposit of Rs. 70,00,000/- and the same is a “Financial Debt” in terms of Section 5(8)(f) of IBC, 2016.
The Applicant has also placed reliance on the Judgment of Hon’ble NCLAT in the matter of Sh. Satish Chand Gupta Vs. Sarvel India Pvt. Ltd. in Company Appeal No. 502/2020:
“37.……….. the term ‘deposit’ includes any receipt of money by a company either as deposit or loan or in any other form by it…….”
“42.………. the ‘Corporate Debtor’ had accepted money from the Appellant against the payment of interest and bearing in mind the payment of interest on the amounts borrowed by the Respondent Company is nothing but a consideration for the time value of money and in as much as the ‘interest’ is the compensation paid by the borrower to the lender for using the lender’s money over a period of time, this Tribunal comes to an inevitable and inescapable conclusion that the Appellant’s status is that of a ‘Financial Creditor’ as per Section 5(7) read with Section 5(8) of the Code and that there is a default in payment of the accepted amounts by the Respondent/CD and in short, the Respondent / Corporate Debtor comes within the purview of the definition of ‘Financial Debt’……”
After hearing submissions of the Applicant and perusing the documents and written submissions placed on record,wefeel that before examining whether the debt claimed by the applicant in Part IV of the Application is a “Financial Debt” or not, it is necessary to examine the origin of the transaction. Hence, we refer to the relevant clause of the deposit in the Agreement dated 25.03.2019, contained, scanned copy of which is reproduced below :
Here, we also refer to the definition of “Financial Debt” as defined under Section 5(8) of IBC, 2016 :
(8)“financial debt” means a debt alongwith interest, if any, which is disbursed against the consideration for the time value of money and includes–
(a)money borrowed against the payment of interest;
(b)any amount raised by acceptance under any acceptance credit facility or its dematerialised equivalent;
(c)any amount raised pursuant to any note purchase facility or the issue of bonds, notes, debentures, loan stock or any similar instrument;
(d)the amount of any liability in respect of any lease or hire purchase contract which is deemed as a finance or capital lease under the Indian Accounting Standards or such other accounting standards as may be prescribed;
(e)receivables sold or discounted other than any receivables sold on non-recourse basis;
(f)any amount raised under any other transaction, including any forward sale or purchase agreement, having the commercial effect of a borrowing;
[Explanation. -For the purposes of this sub-clause, -
(i)any amount raised from an allottee under a real estate project shall be deemed to be an amount having the commercial effect of a borrowing; and
(ii)the expressions, “allottee” and “real estate project” shall have the meanings respectively assigned to them in clauses (d) and (zn) of section 2 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (16 of 2016);]
(g)any derivative transaction entered into in connection with protection against or benefit from fluctuation in any rate or price and for calculating the value of any derivative transaction, only the market value of such transaction shall be taken into account;
(h)any counter-indemnity obligation in respect of a guarantee, indemnity, bond, documentary letter of credit or any other instrument issued by a bank or financial institution;
(i)the amount of any liability in respect of any of the guarantee or indemnity for any of the items referred to in sub-clause (a) to (h) of this clause;
From the conjoint reading of para 12 and 13 above, we find that in the instant case, the amount has been released pursuant to the Agreement dated 25.03.2019 in the form of Security Deposit and the same is interest bearing, which means it is carrying consideration of time value of money having commercial effect of a borrowing. Therefore, in our view the “debt” claimed is a “Financial Debt” within the definition of Section 5(8)(f) of IBC, 2016.
Accordingly, we find that the Petition is maintainable. Therefore, we direct the petitioner to issue notice upon the Corporate Debtor by all modes as to why the CIR process shall not be initiated against it. List the matter on 29.10.2021.
However, nothing expressed herein shall be construed as an opinion on the merits of the case and shall not come as an obstacle for the Corporate Debtor in raising its defence.
