Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench(2022) 03 DRAT CK 0013

Mr. Pandiyan Nallakannu Naidu & Anr vs Authorized Officer, Punjab National Bank

Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 22 March 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ashok Menon, Chairperson
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
I.A. No. 81 Of 2021 In Appeal No. 14 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 468 words

Ashok Menon, Chairperson

1.

I.A. No. 81/2021 is an application filed by Appellants for waiver of pre-deposi u/s 18 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the SARFAESI Act).

2.

The total amount which the Appellants were called upon to pay vide notice dated 29.12.2018 u/s 13 (2) of the SARFAESI Act is Rs.1,14,00,405.05 which was to be paid within a period of 60 days  from the date of receipt of the  said notice. Further interest on the said amount has also accrued.

3.

The id. counsel appearing for Respondent Bank submits that as the Appellants have deposited an amount of Rs.15 Lakhs directly with the Respondent Bank to avail the benefits of the O.T.S. and an amount of Rs.25 Lakhs was deposited before the Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat, in the proceeding connected with the matter and Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat has permitted the Appellant —° Petitioner to withdraw that amount. There is interim  stay  granted  by  Hon'ble  High  Court  of Gujarat  till 28.03.2022  preventing  the  creditor  bank  from  handing  over possession to the auction purchaser.

4.

Ld. Counsel appearing for Appellants submits that Rs.15 Lakhs deposited before the Bank and Rs.25 Lakhs before the Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat which is yet to be withdrawn and to be deposited before this Tribunal may also be considered for the statutory requirement and it would be more than 25% the minimum as required by the statute for entertaining this Appeal. Hence, he seeks waiver of the deposit to the tune of 50%.

5.

IA. Counsel appearing for Bank submits that from out of Rs.15 Lakhs deposited with the Bank, Rs.2 Lakhs has gone to National Defence Fund as per the order of the DRT and the Bank has actually received only Rs.13 Lakhs, and regarding Rs.25 Lakhs deposited before the Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat, it is not known whether that amount has already been withdrawn by the Appellant. Unless that amount also is deposited before this Tribunal,  granting  of waiver  cannot  be   considered   by  this Appellate Tribunal, submits the learned counsel for the Bank.

6.

Taking into consideration the submissions of both sides, I find that waiver can be allowed taking into consideration the amount of Rs.13 Lakhs which deposited directly by the with the Bank and Rs.25 Lakhs deposited before the Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat, provided the Appellants withdraws that amount from the Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat and deposits it before the Registrar of this Tribunal on or before 28.03.2022.

7.

The stay application which the Appellants have filed shall be taken up for hearing provided the above amount of Rs.25 Lakhs  is  deposited  before  the  Registrar  of this  Tribunal,  as directed.

8.

Post on 28.03.2022 for compliance/hearing on stay application.