High CourtsSingle Bench(2012) 01 KAR CK 0262

Mr. Marwin D Cruz vs Mr. John D''souza and National Insurance Company Ltd.

Karnataka High Court · Decided on 4 January 2012

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravi Malimath, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
M.F.A. No. 2831 of 2009 (MV)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 264 words

Ravi Malimath

1.

Aggrieved by the judgment and award in M.V.C. No. 292/2008 dated 27.15.2008 passed by the Prl. Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.) & Addl, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Udupi, the claimant has filed present appeal seeking enhancement

2.

The case of the claimant is that on 27.12.2007 at about 5.30 p.m., when he was going on his two wherever, a Car dashed him. He suffered injuries and was shifted to the Hospital where he took treatment. Thereafter, the claim petition was filed wherein the Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs. 80,800/- along with interest at the rate of 8% p.s. Being dissatisfied with the same, the claimant has filed this appeal seeking enhancement

3.

In the instance case, the Doctor has not been examined. The entire claim is based on Ex.P4, the wound certificate. The Tribunal has awarded Rs. 30,000/- towards pain and suffering, Rs. 2,000/- towards conveyance, Rs. 3,000/- towards attendant and nourishing food, Rs. 35,800/- towards medical expenses end Rs. 10,000/-towards discomfort and loss of amenities. The tribunal has considered the material evidence on record and has awarded adequate amount on all various heads, I do not find the compensation awarded by the Tribunal calls for any interference or enhancement The same is just and proper and awarded notwithstanding the fact that the Doctor has not been examined to state about the injuries and the extent of discomfort or otherwise which has been pleaded by the appellant Based on the available material, the quantum awarded is just and proper and does not call for any interference. Hence, the appeal is dismissed.