Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2019) 12 NCLT CK 0550

Mr. Korea Trade Insurance Corporation (Ksure) vs M/s. Aquashield Chemtech Pvt. Ltd.

National Company Law Tribunal · Decided on 19 December 2019

HON’BLE JUDGES
Abni Ranjan Kumar Sinha, Member (J) · V.K. Subburaj, Member (T)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
IB-1761/ND/2019

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 316 words

An application has been filed by the Resolution Professional praying therein to present application for withdrawal of the petition No. 1761/ND/2019 in terms of Section 12 A of the IBBI Code 2016 Regulation 30 (A) (4) of the Insolvency Regulation 2016. Learned counsel appearing for the Resolution Professional in this case says that there is no financial-creditor and there is only one operational-creditor, who is the petitioner himself and therefore, COC has constituted consisting of the applicant only. He further submitted that the operational-creditor has entered into an agreement with the corporate-debtor and in terms of settlement, he files an application through the Resolution Professional to withdraw the application/petition No. 1761/ND/2019 in term of Section 12 A of the IB Code 2016 Regulation 30 (A) (4) of the Insolvency Regulation 2016. He further submitted that the matter was placed before the 3rd COC, held on 12th December, 2019 and it was resolved by 100 per cent voting by which the RP was authorised to submit an application before the NCLT, New Delhi Bench for withdrawal. He further submitted the the CIRP cost has been received by the RP and this facts has been mentioned by the RP in the present application in para 18 of the application and so prayed to waive the requirement of furnishing the bank guarantee under Regulation 30 (A) (4) of the Insolvency Regulation 2016.

Considering the submissions made on behalf of the Resolution Professional and averment made in the application and as well as Resolution passed by the COC, we think it proper to allow the Resolution Professional to withdraw the applications and since the cost of the CIRP has already been received by the Resolution Professional, therefore, we allow the prayed to waive the requirement of furnishing the bank guarantee under Regulation 30 (A) (4) of the Insolvency Regulation 2016. Accordingly the company case No. 1761/ND/2019 is dismissed as withdrawn.