High CourtsSingle Bench(2012) 02 MAD CK 0075

Mr. Ashok Sarrangan vs The Regional Transport Officer Chennai-South Chennai-600041

Madras High Court · Decided on 21 February 2012

HON’BLE JUDGES
M. Jaichandren, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 3967 of 2012 and M.P. No''s. 1 and 2 of 2012

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

18 paragraphs · 355 words

Honourable Mr. Justice M. Jaichandren

1.

Mr. M.L. Mahendran, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents.

2.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the respondent.

3.

The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that the petitioner is a ""Business Consultant"". He has been rendering

professional services for corporate industries. He has been operating from his principal place of business at Pondicherry. However, he has been

frequently visiting various places in the state of Tamil Nadu, using his SKODA car, bearing Registration No. PYO1 BM 2266. While so, the

respondent has issued the impugned order asking the petitioner to pay the road tax applicable to the State of Tamilnadu, within a period of seven

days from the date of receipt of a copy of the said order, failing which necessary action will be initiated against the petitioner, as per Section 18-A

of the Tamilnadu Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1974. The learned counsel for the petitioner had further stated that the petitioner had submitted a

reply, dated 01.02.2012, to the impugned order, issued by the respondent, dated 20.01.2012. However, the respondent had not passed any

order thereon, till date.

4.

The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent would submit, on instructions, that the respondent may be directed to consider the

reply submitted by the petitioner, on 01.02.2012, and to pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law, within a stipulated period.

5.

In view of the above, the respondent is directed to consider the reply submitted by the petitioner, on 01.02.2012 and pass appropriate orders,

on merits and in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of four weeks from the date of

receipt of a copy of this Order. However, it is made clear that the respondent shall not initiate any action against the petitioner, pursuant to the

impugned order passed by the respondent, until the respondent passes an order, as directed by this Court, by this order.

The writ petition is ordered accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.