High CourtsDivision Bench(2021) 07 TEL CK 0081

Mourya Srinu VsState Of Telangana

Telangana High Court · Decided on 29 July 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
A.Rajasheker Reddy, Dr. Shameem Akther, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Revision Petition No.2048 Of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

29 paragraphs · 606 words
1.

This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by the petitioner, wherein, the following prayer is made:

“…to issue an order or orders more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the Respondents herein to produce the

detenues 1.Mourya Ramesh S/o.Til Singh Occ: Goldsmith aged 25 years, R/o: Chapala market, Mahabubabad Town and District, Detenue No.2

Giddela Durga Prasad S/o.Late Durgaiah, aged about 35 years, Occ:Tractor Driver R/o; Pattipaka Mahabubabad Town and District 3.Nunavath

Vinay S/o. Late Holi aged 28 years, Occ: Mestri, R/o: Sankariya Thanda Mahabubabad Town and District 4. Thupakula Yadaiah S/o. Malsoor aged

about 28 years, Occ: Auto Driver, R/o: pattipaka Mahabubabad Town and District before the Hon’ble High Court and record the statement and

set the detenus at liberty and pass such other order or orders …â€​

2.

We have heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing on behalf

of the respondents and perused the record.

3.

In the course of submissions, it is brought to the notice of this Court by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home that the alleged detenu

No.1 is arrayed as A3 in Crime No.166 of 2021 of Mahabubabad Police Station, alleged detenu Nos.2 and 4 are arrayed as A1 and A2, respectively,

in Crime Nos.158 and 166 of 2021 of Mahabubabad Police Station and alleged detenu No.3 is arrayed as A3 in Crime No.158 of 2021 of

Mahabubabad Police Station. Crime No.158 of 2021 of Mahabubabad Police Station was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379

and 411 of I.P.C., whereas Crime No.166 of 2021 of Mahabubabad Police Station was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 457, 380

and 411 of I.P.C. The alleged detenus were arrested on 26.07.2021 and produced before the learned Principal Judicial Magistrate of First Class,

Mahabubabad, on 27.07.2021 and remanded to judicial custody. They are now lodged in sub-jail, Mahabubabad. There is no illegal detention, as

alleged by the petitioner.

4.

Here, it is apt to state that Habeas Corpus is a writ calling upon the person who has illegally/wrongfully detained another, to produce the latter

before the Court, in order to let the Court know on what ground he/she has been detained, and to set him/her free if there is no legal justification for

the detention. A writ of Habeas Corpus cannot be issued, when a person is not in illegal/unlawful detention.

5.

As per the submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, alleged detenu No.1 is arrayed as A3 in Crime No.166 of

2021 of Mahabubabad Police Station, alleged detenu Nos.2 and 4 are arrayed as A1 and A2, respectively, in Crime Nos.158 and 166 of 2021 of

Mahabubabad Police Station and alleged detenu No.3 is arrayed as A3 in Crime No.158 of 2021 of Mahabubabad Police Station. The alleged detenus

were arrested on 26.07.2021 and produced before the learned Principal Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Mahabubabad, on 27.07.2021 and remanded

to judicial custody. Right now, the alleged detenus are in judicial custody in criminal case/s pending against them. Hence, it cannot be held that there is

illegal/unlawful or unjustifiable detention of the alleged detenus, as alleged by the petitioner. Under these circumstances, no relief as sought by the

petitioner can be granted.However, it is open to the alleged detenus or any aggrieved person to workout the remedies available under law.

6.

With the above observations, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.