High CourtsSingle Bench(1878) 04 CAL CK 0012

Mothoora Mohun Roy vs Peary Mohun Shaw

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 2 April 1878 · Citation: (1879) ILR (Cal) 259

HON’BLE JUDGES
Pontifex, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 88 words

Pontifex, J.—Section 8 does not refer to such instruments only. These bills are not admissible upon another ground. If you contend that Section 28 applies only to instruments chargeable with one anna, then, Section 5 shows that you cannot use an adhesive stamp at all. Again, Section 19 seems to show that Section 20 does not apply to bills of exchange at all. It could not have been intended that s.20 should alter s.19.� I must admit the objection as to these hundis as they are insufficiently stamped.