High CourtsDivision Bench(2024) 12 DEL CK 2069

Mohsin Dehlvi Proprietor Of Dehlvi Naturals vs Sana Herbals Private Limited Through Its Authorized Representative Mr Mohd Tahir

Delhi High Court · Decided on 12 December 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Navin Chawla, J · Shalinder Kaur, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
LPA 205/2024 & CM APPL. 14561/2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 234 words

NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (Oral)

1.

This appeal has been filed under Clause 10 of the Letter Patents against the Order dated 29.01.2024 passed in IA 559/2024 in CS(COMM) 813/2016 by the Learned Single Judge of this Court, seeking consolidation of all the respective connected matters. The appellant is aggrieved by the Impugned Order, as it has observed that the consolidation of the said rectification proceedings is not required.

2.

The learned counsel for the appellant submits that by an Order dated 12.11.2024 passed in C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 201/2022 titled MOHSIN DEHLVI, TRADING AS DEHLVI NATURALS v. SANA HERBALS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR., a rectification petition filed by the petitioner against the registered trademark of the appellant under Trademark No.717010 in class 05, being rectification petition no.269421 has been directed to be transferred to the High Court to be listed along with C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 201/2022. She submits that, therefore, the mark "DEHLVI" would also now be a subject matter of adjudication in the said rectification petition.

3.

The learned counsel for the respondent no.1 disputes the above submission. As in any case, this would be a development which is subsequent to the passing of the Impugned Order. In case the petitioner has any remedy, the petitioner may avail of the same in accordance with law.

4.

We do not for the present find any infirmity in the Impugned

Order.

5.

The appeal is accordingly disposed of.