High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 04 P&H CK 0050

Mohinder Singh @ Babla vs State of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 3 April 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Raj Mohan Singh, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
CRM-M No.237 of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 242 words

RAJ MOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL)

1.

Petitioner seeks grant of regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C in case bearing FIR No.63 dated 26.06.2012, registered under Sections 382, 34 IPC

at Police Station Nangal, Tehsil Sri Anandpur Sahib, District Rupnagar.

2.

Earlier petitioner was on bail. However, he absented from the Court on 20.05.2016 and ultimately came to be arrested only on 30.09.2017. In the

meanwhile, he was declared proclaimed offender on 20.02.2017.

3.

Petitioner was taken on production warrants and his custody in the present case is w.e.f. 01.10.2017 i.e. 03 months 28 days as on 29.01.2018.

4.

Petitioner was arrested on 30.09.2017 and since then, he is in judicial custody.

5.

Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Balbir Singh submits that due to absence of the petitioner, the trial of the case was delayed

unnecessarily.

6.

Since the petitioner was granted bail during investigation, he absented from the Court on 20.05.2016 and was ultimately declared proclaimed

offender on 20.02.2017 and thereafter, he was arrested by the police on 30.09.2017.

7.

Keeping in view the previous status of the petitioner, in my considered opinion, regular bail can be granted to the petitioner.

8.

In view of above, petition is allowed. Petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on bail, subject to his furnishing heavy bail bonds/surety bonds to the

satisfaction of the trial Court.

9.

Nothing expressed hereinabove would be construed to be an expression of any opinion on merits of the case.